The Secretary of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution explained the distinction between foresight, future selection, and future-making, stating that in desired foresight, a deterministic approach is unacceptable and caution must be exercised to ensure that descriptions from the humanities do not turn into prescriptions for engineering human behavior and the future.
❓ Unknown
Deterministic Approach in Desired Foresight is Unacceptable
Just now
September 17, 2026
1 min read
📰 ISNA
📋 Key Takeaway
The Secretary of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution emphasized the importance of distinguishing between different approaches to foresight, rejecting deterministic methods. This discussion is crucial as it addresses the potential misuse of humanities in shaping future societal behaviors in Iran.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
🌐
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%
📰 Related Coverage
9 min ago •
Living with Lamellar Ichthyosis: The Added Burden of Allergies and Health Complications
11 min ago •
Incident Involving a Tanker East of Aden
12 min ago •
Trump Discusses Critical Decision Point in U.S.-Iran Relations with Axios
17 min ago •
Second International Conference on Museums: An Event to Enhance the Role of Museums in Scientific…
18 min ago •