Six Requests from the Investigator of the Setayesh Ghorishi Case to Forensic Medicine

The newspaper Iran has published the six requests from the investigator of the Setayesh Ghorishi case as stated by the prosecutor of Varamin. He mentioned that several factors are of high importance to them: first, the cause of the murder, the manner and time of the murder, and whether the victim was assaulted. Additionally, the exact age of the murder suspect and the determination of the suspect's mental health must be established. Abolqasem Morad Talab, the prosecutor of Varamin, stated that this information has not yet reached them, but as soon as the results of these factors are received, the case will be completed and sent to the first criminal court. The newspaper also reported that the forensic medicine has indicated that there is no longer a need to keep the body, as necessary sampling and photography have been completed, allowing the family to bury Setayesh. The family of Setayesh Ghorishi, a six-year-old Afghan girl living in Kheyrabad Varamin, had gone to the police in search of her after her return was delayed and simultaneously distributed notices throughout Varamin. Meanwhile, the 17-year-old murderer had burned the young girl in acid after assaulting and killing her, just three houses away from Setayesh's family home. The newspaper Etemad reported on the first page of its May 1 issue about two important resolutions from the Islamic Consultative Assembly on the last day of reviewing the budget bill for the year 1395, stating that the government is mandated by the representatives to implement 'gasoline rationing' and 'the removal of 24 million subsidy recipients.' The newspaper emphasized that the representatives utilized all their legal capacities to apply their desired changes to the budget bill, resulting in a budget that was 26 trillion tomans more than the bill presented by the government, amounting to over 978 trillion tomans. However, within this document, two very important decisions regarding gasoline and subsidies were made: first, the reintroduction of dual pricing for gasoline, and second, the removal of three income brackets from subsidy recipients. According to the Etemad newspaper, the resolution emphasized that the government should provide fuel cards to consumers within four months, with part of the designated share at a rate of 1000 tomans and the excess at the cost price for vehicle owners. Furthermore, 'the price of gasoline in the FOB Persian Gulf determines part of the cost price of gasoline, and this figure must include additional costs such as evaporation, insurance, transportation, distribution, and legal taxes and fees.' The Hamdeli newspaper referred to the '24 million person struggle' between the government and the parliament, stating that despite the government's opposition, the parliament approved the plan to remove households with a monthly income of three million tomans from subsidies. According to this newspaper, under the parliament's resolution, three income brackets of people with an average monthly income of three million tomans will be identified and removed by the government, and it is stated in the relevant regulations that if this resolution is not implemented by the government by Tir month, receiving any amount of the subsidy will be considered illegal appropriation of public property. Hamdeli discussed the government's opposition to this method of removing subsidy recipients, noting that Mohammad Baqer Nobakht, who was present in the parliament on Tuesday, again opposed the income criterion of 35 million tomans per year, stating that a family with this income might have a terminally ill member or a student child, and the government cannot remove individuals from subsidies based solely on income. The newspaper Tejarat evaluated the budgetary resolutions of the parliament on Tuesday as 'a budget for non-implementation.' Ali Asghar Saeedi, a socio-economic expert, in the editorial of this newspaper titled 'The Cost of Hasty Decisions by the Parliament for Society,' wrote about the resolution to remove the top three income brackets from the list of cash subsidy recipients, stating that 'the parliament's resolution, which has not been approved by the government, is very hasty and therefore carries a political inference. Many believe that the parliament wants to carry out this removal and wait for someone else to come and promise to restore these figures if they become president, which would lead to votes.' The editorial writer of Tejarat, while listing the criticisms of the method for removing 24 million people from the list of subsidy recipients, stated that 'identifying two income brackets may have controllable errors, but adding one bracket to two increases the error significantly. It is unclear why the government does not start by gradually removing one bracket to see how this removal affects incomes.' The newspaper Shargh published on its front page 'The President's Criticism of the Attacks Against the Nuclear Agreement,' quoting Hassan Rouhani as saying, 'People have not forgotten that no bank transfer was possible through banking systems to the country, and we had gone back to the 19th century.' According to this newspaper, Hassan Rouhani, during his 26th provincial trip on Tuesday, traveled by train to his birthplace, Semnan, and during his speech in Semnan, he stated, 'The JCPOA has registered a political and legal honor for the history of the Iranian nation.' The newspaper Shahrvand also described Hassan Rouhani's remarks as 'the President's response to critics of the JCPOA,' quoting him as saying, 'The time for criticizing the JCPOA has passed; now is the time for implementation.' According to this newspaper, Hassan Rouhani pointed out that 'only three months have passed since the implementation of the JCPOA, and some think it has been 30 years,' stating, 'When destruction occurs, rebuilding takes time.' The newspaper Kayhan quoted Hassan Rouhani on its front page, saying, 'Look at the numerous openings that have occurred in these three months.' However, this newspaper simultaneously published an editorial titled 'No Apology,' stating that 'after Valiollah Seif, the head of the Central Bank, after meeting with American officials and presumably hearing their disappointing responses, honestly expressed what everyone, even those who supported the JCPOA, felt and said that the result of three years of trusting America has been 'almost nothing.' An apology was the least that those who beautified America and the JCPOA could have offered to the people, but they did not, and it seems they have no intention of doing so.' The newspaper Vatan-e-Emruz, close to the Steadfast Front, printed a photo of Hassan Rouhani with raised hands on its front page and titled it 'Where is the Honor?!', describing the remarks of the 11th government president in Semnan as 'a new attack by Hassan Rouhani against the critics of the government after the confession of the Central Bank President regarding American obstruction in lifting sanctions.' This newspaper explicitly targeted the Islamic Republic's president and stated, 'On Tuesday, Hassan Rouhani again attacked the critics, making new accusations against them. He accused the media of creating chaos. He said no one should criticize the JCPOA, and in a situation where his government officials have been beautifying the anti-Iranian actions of the Americans in recent months, he accused the critics of lacking honor.' Vatan-e-Emruz referred to the part of Hassan Rouhani's remarks in Semnan, where he said, 'I am surprised that some want to imply that the Iranian nation is not victorious, but America is victorious. I am surprised that some say Iranian diplomats are not victorious, but Zionists are victorious; where did national pride and religious honor go?' The newspaper Vatan-e-Emruz also, in its editorial titled 'The Common Fate of the JCPOA and Its Supporters,' implicitly compared Hassan Rouhani to Boris Yeltsin, the former president of Russia and one of the influential figures in the collapse of the Soviet Union, stating, 'People earnestly ask politicians not to spend their professional lives and national dignity helping the enemy and to avoid relying on the electoral promises of a fallen leader, considering the historical misfortune of Yeltsin's versions.' The newspaper Arman, in its front page titled 'The Minister of Interior at the Crossroads of Ali Motahari,' quoted this member of the Islamic Consultative Assembly as saying, 'If the Minister of Interior issues the credentials of the third elected representative of Isfahan, the impeachment will be canceled.' Ali Motahari stated, 'If Ms. Khalighi's credentials are not issued, impeachment will proceed, and I have already spoken with several representatives who have all expressed their agreement to sign the impeachment of the Minister of Interior.' This newspaper reminded that 'Minou Khalighi, the candidate of the people of Isfahan, has been disqualified after her victory was announced in the Isfahan constituency.' The newspaper Khorasan introduced the suspect in the murder of Setayesh Ghorishi as a teenager named 'Amir Hossein' and quoted his father as saying, 'While I was at work, I was informed that my son had committed murder. I immediately went with my son to introduce him to the police station. My son confessed to the murder, and I was detained for one night. After they assured that I had done nothing wrong, I was released.' This newspaper also quoted the mother of the murderer of Setayesh Ghorishi as saying, 'The victim's family is a good family and has not done us any harm; I do not know why my son committed this sin; I am ashamed of the victim's family.' Saeed Barabadi, while publishing a report about the narrative of 'Afghan girls in the Kheyran Child Labor Center regarding their fears and concerns' in the newspaper Shargh, wrote, 'Many ask why Setayesh's family is silent; they do not know that victimhood itself is the loudest voice when the savior is asleep.' The newspaper Vaghaye Ettefaghieh, in a report titled 'A Few Steps Away from the Destruction of a Unique Archive of an Artist,' expressed concern about the preservation of books, an unparalleled archive of films and music, manuscripts, articles, and numerous research works of Zavan Ghoqasyan, calling for the establishment of a foundation in the name of this artist. This newspaper reminded that Zavan Ghoqasyan, a filmmaker, critic, and researcher of Iranian cinema and one of the prominent cultural figures of Isfahan, passed away fourteen months ago after months of battling cancer.