The United States says that the Supreme Court's decision regarding the seizure of $2 billion of Iranian assets in the country "complies with international law." According to Reuters, Mark Toner, the spokesperson for the U.S. State Department, responded on Friday, April 29, to a letter from Iran's Foreign Minister to the UN Secretary-General, stating that both U.S. laws and the examination of the Central Bank of Iran's case in U.S. courts are in accordance with international law. Reuters also published comments from an unnamed U.S. official who said that Washington has "communication lines" with Iran and will continue to address important issues for both sides through these lines. This official stated that the Obama administration sees no need for UN mediation in this case. Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's Foreign Minister, requested last week in a letter to the UN Secretary-General to mediate to compel the United States to release Iran's frozen assets in the country. However, the UN spokesperson, despite announcing Ban Ki-moon's readiness to engage in this issue, stated that this matter would be "subject to the agreement of the United States." The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on April 20 that $2 billion of Iran's frozen assets in the country should be paid to the families of American victims of several terrorist operations linked to Tehran, including the 1983 bombings of the U.S. Marine Corps and French soldiers in Beirut, the capital of Lebanon. While Mohammad Javad Zarif has stated that the Islamic Republic does not recognize this ruling, Abbas Araqchi, the deputy foreign minister, has also stated that lawyers for the Central Bank of Iran participated in the aforementioned courts, and this means that the Islamic Republic has recognized the jurisdiction of the U.S. court. Araqchi's point has not yet received a reaction from officials of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government. Iranian lawyers could not have entered U.S. courts without the permission and authorization of the head and secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, who at that time were Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Saeed Jalili.
The U.S. Rejects UN Mediation in the $2 Billion Case
The U.S. has rejected calls for UN mediation regarding the $2 billion in Iranian assets seized by the Supreme Court, asserting that its actions comply with international law. Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif requested UN intervention to release the assets, but the U.S. maintains it sees no need for such mediation. This situation highlights ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Iran over financial and legal disputes.
👥 Key Players
⚡ Actions
📰 What Happened
U.S. rejects UN mediation in case involving $2 billion of Iranian assets seized for terrorism claims.
- U.S. Supreme Court seize Iran's assets
- U.S. State Department reject UN mediation
- Mohammad Javad Zarif request UN Secretary-General
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The U.S. maintains its stance on asset seizure, complicating diplomatic relations with Iran.
📝 Key Evidence
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%