"We must provide high-quality and stable internet to the people." This statement was made by Setar Hashemi, the Minister of Communications and Information Technology of the fourteenth government. This government entered the electoral battle with the slogan of lifting filtering, and in the dispute over lifting filters with its supporters, it only succeeded in removing Google Play and WhatsApp, which were again filtered due to the imposed war. President Mardakian has also repeatedly expressed his opposition to the filtering project. Of course, the proponents of filtering present various arguments, and this debate does not simply come to an end. Recently, Rasoul Jalili, a real member of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace, has considered the approach of fully reopening a platform like Instagram to be against reason and fairness.
Why is Internet Quality in Iran Poor?
The Iranian Minister of Communications emphasized the need for quality internet, amidst ongoing debates about internet filtering in the country. The government faces criticism for its failure to deliver on its promises to lift restrictions, with notable figures both supporting and opposing filtering measures. This issue is significant as it reflects broader tensions in Iranian society regarding internet freedom and government control.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The Iranian Minister of Communications called for improved internet quality while the government faces criticism for not lifting internet filters. The debate continues among officials regarding the extent of internet freedom.
- The government has only partially lifted filters, affecting platforms like Google Play and WhatsApp.
- There is an ongoing internal debate about the appropriateness of fully reopening platforms like Instagram.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran has a history of internet censorship, with the government frequently imposing filters on social media and communication platforms to control information flow.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%