Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

A Member of Parliament: 70 Percent of the Annual Budget is Approved Without Representatives' Vote

Jan 26, 2026 January 26, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Mohammad Reza Badamchi, a member of the Iranian parliament, revealed that only one-third of the national budget is reviewed by parliament, leaving 70% unvoted by representatives. This raises concerns about transparency and accountability in budget allocation, particularly regarding military and religious institutions. The issue highlights ongoing debates about government spending priorities in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Iran's budget process lacks transparency, with significant funds going to military and religious sectors without parliamentary oversight.

👥 Key Players

Mohammad Reza Badamchi MENTIONED
Vice President of the Social Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly
"He is a member of the Iranian parliament raising concerns about budget transparency and accountability."
Hassan Rouhani MENTIONED
President of Iran
"As the President, he is responsible for presenting the national budget and addressing concerns about its allocation."
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) MENTIONED
Military and security institution
"They receive a significant portion of the budget, highlighting issues of military spending and control."

📰 What Happened

Mohammad Reza Badamchi revealed that 70% of Iran's national budget is not reviewed by parliament, raising concerns about transparency. The budget allocation favors military and religious institutions, sparking public debate.

  • 70% of the national budget is not voted on by parliament.
  • Significant funds are allocated to military and religious institutions.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This issue highlights concerns about government transparency and the influence of military and religious sectors on national spending.
🌍 Regional: Iran's budget priorities, especially military spending, can affect regional stability and security dynamics.
🌐 International: Western countries monitoring Iran's military spending may view this as a concern for regional security.

📚 Background

Iran's budget process is often criticized for lack of transparency, with significant portions allocated to powerful institutions like the IRGC without public scrutiny.

Iranian military spending Government transparency in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The information comes from a parliamentary member's statements, reflecting internal political debates.

The Vice President of the Social Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly states that only "one third" of the national budget is reviewed in the parliament, and the representatives of the people "do not have the opportunity to vote on 70 percent of the budget." Mohammad Reza Badamchi shared this information on his personal Twitter account, announcing the end of the review of the 1397 budget bill and its submission to the Guardian Council. He wrote that "public opinion should know that only one-third of the total budget of the country is reviewed in parliament, which is merely limited to the government's public resources and expenditures." This representative did not provide an explanation about the institution or institutions that decide on the other two-thirds of the country's budget, adding that "in other words, the representatives of the people do not have the opportunity to vote on 70 percent of the budget, which mainly includes the resources and expenditures of large state-owned companies, government-affiliated profit-making institutions, and banks." He called for a "100 percent" review of Iran's budget in parliament and added that "some sectors benefiting from government budgets are out of sight of oversight institutions, including parliament, and therefore act non-transparently." Badamchi added that he and "a few of his colleagues" are calling for a comprehensive review of all resources and expenditures of the country. The head of the Labor Faction of the Islamic Consultative Assembly did not mention the names of these sectors. Hassan Rouhani, the President of Iran, presented the 1397 budget bill to the Iranian parliament on December 10, describing it as different from previous budgets and a manifestation of his electoral promises. On January 1, he also stated in a meeting with the heads of parliamentary commissions that "in total, nearly 200 trillion tomans out of 360 trillion tomans are lost due to issues beyond the government's control." The President added that "60 trillion tomans are allocated for pension funds and more than 40 trillion tomans for cash subsidies. 60 trillion tomans are also allocated to the National Development Fund, and 10 to 11 trillion tomans are given as retirement bonuses. Additionally, subsidies are provided for agricultural development." Furthermore, the review of the 1397 budget shows that the share of religious, military, and security institutions that are not accountable to the government has increased in the next year's budget. The budget for military and security institutions in the next year's budget bill is nearly 50 trillion tomans, most of which is under the control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Although reports indicate that more than 2 trillion tomans are allocated to religious seminaries in various sectors of the 1397 budget, some clerics, including Ahmad Alamolhoda, the Friday Prayer Imam of Mashhad, and Kazem Sedighi, the Friday Prayer Imam of Tehran, have called for an increase in the budget for religious seminaries. Following the details of the 1397 budget being revealed, campaigns have also formed in cyberspace under the title "Changing the Budget in Favor of the People," and some participants in these campaigns have called for a reduction in the budgets of religious seminaries, state media, and military institutions. Rouhani also responded to these criticisms on December 19, stating: "It is the right of the people to compare. They say, 'You allocated this much money to this cultural institution.' They protest and ask why it is so much." He added that "there was a long list of 17 different institutions that only took money from us; we would give them money at the beginning of the year, and if it was delayed even for a day, they would protest, asking why the government had not given them their money and why it was late. Then we would ask where they spent this money, and they would say it was none of your business."

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →