Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

A 'Principlist' Activist Criticizes the Presence of 'Retired Officials from a Security-Political Organization' in Election Executive Boards

Feb 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Mansour Haqiqatpour, a Principlist activist, criticized the significant increase in candidate disqualifications for the upcoming parliamentary elections, attributing it to the selection of executive boards from a specific political class. He expressed concerns about the lack of experience among election officials and the implications of using retired security officials in the process. This situation raises questions about the integrity of the electoral process in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The controversy over candidate disqualifications highlights deepening divisions within Iran's political factions and raises questions about the fairness of upcoming elections.

👥 Key Players

Mansour Haqiqatpour MENTIONED
Principlist political activist
"As a member of the Principlist faction, he represents a significant segment of the Iranian political landscape that supports the current regime but is critical of certain practices within it."
Ali Khamenei MENTIONED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"As the highest authority in Iran, his views and directives significantly influence the political process and the legitimacy of elections."
Ahmad Khatami MENTIONED
Interim Friday prayer leader of Tehran
"His position allows him to shape public opinion and support for the regime's actions, including the disqualification of candidates."

📰 What Happened

Mansour Haqiqatpour criticized the significant rise in disqualifications of parliamentary candidates from 8% to 28% for the upcoming elections, attributing it to the selection of biased executive boards. He expressed concerns about the inexperience of election officials and the implications of using retired security personnel.

  • Disqualification rates for candidates have increased from 8% to 28% compared to the previous election.
  • Haqiqatpour highlighted concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and the inexperience of many election officials.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The increase in candidate disqualifications raises concerns about the legitimacy of the electoral process and could lead to further political discontent among the populace.
🌍 Regional: A perceived lack of legitimacy in Iranian elections could embolden opposition movements in neighboring countries and affect regional alliances.
🌐 International: International observers may view these developments as indicative of Iran's internal political struggles, impacting diplomatic relations and negotiations.

📚 Background

Iran's electoral system has faced criticism for disqualifying candidates, often seen as a tool to control political narratives. The Principlists and reformists are the two main factions, with the former currently in power.

Iranian parliamentary elections Political factions in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article is based on statements from a political activist and reflects internal criticisms within the regime, suggesting a degree of reliability in reporting dissenting views.

The controversy over disqualifications in the upcoming parliamentary elections has become so intense that it has even raised the voices of political activists considered supporters of the current regime. Mansour Haqiqatpour, a 'Principlist' political activist, in an interview with the 'ILNA' news agency published today, Tuesday, deemed the increase in disqualifications of parliamentary candidates by executive boards from 8% in the previous election to 28% as 'unacceptable,' attributing this to the selection of executive boards 'from a specific political class and group.' Haqiqatpour emphasized that 'the executive boards were entirely chosen from a specific political class and group,' stating that this raises suspicions of 'engineering' among the public. This political activist affiliated with the Principlists noted that disqualified candidates and others are 'somewhat concerned about this issue,' stressing that 'we should not have utilized a specific current in this process.' He insisted that 'it is not acceptable to select individuals from a specific spectrum or a specific political network,' adding: 'If you come to use retirees from a security-political organization, the result will be that in the previous election you had an 8% disqualification rate, and this time it has reached 28%, which is neither logical nor reasonable.' This political activist also criticized the inexperience of many election officials, stating: 'We currently have 20 governors who are experiencing their first election. Most of the executive boards are also first-timers, which will weaken our elections.' The initial results of the 'qualification status' of candidates for the upcoming parliamentary elections were announced on Friday, November 10, while several critical representatives from the 'Revolutionary Parliament' reported their disqualifications. Ahmad Khatami, the interim Friday prayer leader of Tehran, called the disqualifications 'natural' but warned those disqualified to 'act in accordance with the dignity of the educated and not question the system.' Ali Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Republic, also described the elections scheduled for March as 'very important' and stated that 'the enemy's artillery' is engaged in 'electoral bombardment.' The elections for the 11th term of the Islamic Consultative Assembly were held on February 19, 2020, and were recognized as the least participatory elections in the history of the Islamic Republic. Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli, the then Minister of Interior, announced an average participation rate of 42.57%. Two years later, the presidential elections faced 'boycotts' and low public turnout, which officials of the Islamic Republic attempted to attribute to the country's COVID-19 situation.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →