Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

AFC's Silence After Iranian Official's Claim About Cancelled Sepahan and Al-Ittihad Match

Jun 27, 2026 June 27, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The AFC has not responded to the cancellation of a match between Iran's Sepahan and Saudi Arabia's Al-Ittihad, which was reportedly due to the insistence on keeping a statue of Qassem Soleimani. Iranian officials claim an agreement was reached to resolve the issue, while the Saudi team insists they left at the AFC's request. This incident highlights ongoing tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia amidst their attempts to normalize relations.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The cancellation of the match underscores the fragility of Iran-Saudi relations.

👥 Key Players

Hossein Amir-Abdollahian (حسین امیرعبداللهیان) ACTOR
Foreign Minister of Iran
"Amir-Abdollahian claimed that Iran and Saudi Arabia agreed to change the time of the Al-Ittihad and Sepahan match."
Al-Ittihad TARGET
Saudi football club
"The Saudi team stated they left the stadium at the request of the AFC."
Sepahan TARGET
Iranian football club
"Mehdi Rostampour stated that Sepahan was informed a day prior that they must remove the statue of Qassem Soleimani."
Mehdi Rostampour QUOTED
official
"Mehdi Rostampour stated that Sepahan was informed a day prior that they must remove the statue of Qassem Soleimani."
Qassem Soleimani (قاسم سلیمانی) AFFECTED
commander of the Quds Force
"the insistence of Iranian officials to keep a statue of Qassem Soleimani led to the match's cancellation."
AFC ACTOR
Asian Football Confederation
"The AFC's silence comes as this body adheres to FIFA protocols and regulations."

⚡ Actions

Hossein Amir-Abdollahian NEGOTIATE Saudi Arabia
"Amir-Abdollahian claimed that Iran and Saudi Arabia agreed to change the time of the Al-Ittihad and Sepahan match."
Confidence: 90%
Iranian spectators PROTEST politics
"Iranian spectators chanted 'We don't want football with politics' after this incident."
Confidence: 90%
Saudi Football Federation ANNOUNCE Al-Ittihad
"The Saudi Football Federation announced they would seek the rights of the 'Al-Ittihad' club."
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iran's Foreign Minister claims agreement with Saudi Arabia after Sepahan and Al-Ittihad match cancellation.

  • Hossein Amir-Abdollahian negotiate Saudi Arabia
  • Iranian spectators protest politics
  • Saudi Football Federation announce Al-Ittihad

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the intersection of politics and sports in Iran.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects ongoing tensions and attempts at normalization between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
🌐 International: Because it demonstrates the impact of regional diplomacy on international sports.

📚 Background

The cancellation of the match underscores the fragility of Iran-Saudi relations.

📝 Key Evidence

"the insistence of Iranian officials to keep a statue of Qassem Soleimani led to the match's cancellation."
→ This proves the political influence on sports events.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
VOA Persian is a state-funded media outlet, which may influence its reporting.

In the past day, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) has not reacted to the cancelled match between Iran's Sepahan and Saudi Arabia's Al-Ittihad. Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian previously claimed that he reached an agreement with his Saudi counterpart to resolve the 'cancellation crisis'. Meanwhile, the Saudi team stated they left the stadium at the request of the AFC. It was earlier reported that the insistence of Iranian officials to keep a statue of Qassem Soleimani led to the match's cancellation, which should be awarded to Al-Ittihad. The Saudi team, which was supposed to face Sepahan on Monday, October 2, in the AFC Champions League in front of about 60,000 spectators in Isfahan, refused to enter the field. Saudi state television 'Al-Ikhbariya' reported that the reason for this refusal was the installation of a statue of Qassem Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, outside the stadium's entrance tunnel. Iranian spectators chanted 'We don't want football with politics' after this incident. Iranian and Saudi officials had previously faced issues over a picture of Qassem Soleimani at a press conference in Tehran, which led to a change in the conference location due to the Saudi side's anger. The Islamic Republic and Saudi Arabia had significantly reduced their relations since a group of hardline Basijis supportive of Khamenei attacked the Saudi embassy and consulate in Tehran and Mashhad, but in recent months, with China's mediation, the two countries have attempted to normalize relations to the extent of sending ambassadors. The AFC's silence comes as this body adheres to FIFA protocols and regulations in international competitions and, according to diplomatic consultation rules, has no role in deciding or issuing a ruling on the outcome of this match. Iranian officials have mentioned the possibility of replaying this match, but some Arab media claim that Al-Ittihad should be declared the winner by 3-0. After the severance of diplomatic relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2016, matches between the teams of the two countries were held in neutral venues. However, when Riyadh and Tehran resumed diplomatic relations earlier this year with China's mediation, it was announced that Iranian and Saudi teams would now play their matches on their home grounds. Mehdi Rostampour stated that Sepahan was informed a day prior that they must remove the statue of Qassem Soleimani. Amir-Abdollahian claimed that Iran and Saudi Arabia agreed to change the time of the Al-Ittihad and Sepahan match. He further stated that we should not allow sports to become a political lever. The Saudi Football Federation announced they would seek the rights of the 'Al-Ittihad' club.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →