Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Ahmadinejad and Baghaei: We Will Not Support Any Candidate

Jan 28, 2026 January 28, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hamid Baghaei, both disqualified from the presidential election, announced they will not support any candidates. They claimed their candidacy was due to public demand, despite the Supreme Leader's advice against it. This situation highlights ongoing tensions within Iranian politics and the implications of disqualification on electoral dynamics.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Ahmadinejad's disqualification and decision not to support any candidate highlight ongoing tensions and control within Iran's political system.

👥 Key Players

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad MENTIONED
Former President of Iran
"Ahmadinejad is a controversial figure in Iranian politics, known for his hardline stance and previous presidency from 2005 to 2013."
Hamid Baghaei MENTIONED
Former Vice President of Iran
"Baghaei was a close ally of Ahmadinejad and served as his deputy, making him a significant figure in Ahmadinejad's political circle."
Guardian Council MENTIONED
Iranian constitutional body
"The Guardian Council is responsible for vetting candidates for elections, playing a crucial role in shaping the political landscape."
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei MENTIONED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"As the highest authority in Iran, Khamenei's recommendations and decisions significantly influence political outcomes."
Abbasali Kadkhodai MENTIONED
Spokesman for the Guardian Council
"Kadkhodai communicates the decisions and rationale of the Guardian Council, impacting public perception and political discourse."

📰 What Happened

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hamid Baghaei, both disqualified from the presidential election, announced they will not support any candidates. Their disqualification follows the Supreme Leader's previous advice against Ahmadinejad's candidacy.

  • Ahmadinejad and Baghaei were disqualified by the Guardian Council.
  • Ahmadinejad ignored the Supreme Leader's advice not to run, leading to political tension.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The disqualification of high-profile candidates like Ahmadinejad underscores the control of the political system by the Guardian Council and the Supreme Leader, affecting public trust and political engagement.
🌍 Regional: Iran's internal politics can influence its foreign policy and regional behavior, impacting neighboring countries and regional alliances.
🌐 International: Western countries monitor Iran's political developments closely, as they can affect nuclear negotiations and Iran's international posture.

📚 Background

Iran's political system is characterized by a complex interplay between elected positions and religious oversight, with the Supreme Leader and Guardian Council holding significant power over electoral processes.

Iranian presidential elections Role of the Guardian Council
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article provides a factual account of recent political developments without overt bias, but readers should consider the broader context of Iranian state media and political narratives.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hamid Baghaei, two disqualified candidates for the presidential election, in their first reaction to their disqualification, announced in a statement that they would not support any candidate. On Sunday, April 23, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hamid Baghaei stated that they had run for election due to 'widespread and repeated requests' from the people and consider themselves 'small servants of the nation and soldiers of the revolution.' In their statement, these disqualified candidates wrote, 'We explicitly declare that we will not support any individual in the upcoming elections.' The statement did not mention whether Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his supporters would participate in the elections. The Guardian Council did not approve the qualifications of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the former president of Iran, and Hamid Baghaei, his deputy in the tenth government. Following Ahmadinejad's disqualification, several Friday prayer leaders urged the disqualified candidates not to 'cause a commotion.' In recent days, reports about a letter from Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, head of the Dispute Resolution Council, to the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic for the approval of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's qualifications had been published. However, the Telegram channel 'Dolat Bahar,' close to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, denied these reports. Meanwhile, Abbasali Kadkhodai, the spokesman for the Guardian Council, stated on Saturday evening, April 2, in a television program that 'I doubt that any other individual will be approved by a government decree like in 2005.' He also announced that the 'recommendation' of the Supreme Leader to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad not to run in the presidential election was 'not taken into account' in his qualification review unless it was a government decree. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, confirmed on September 27, 2016, that he had told Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that 'it is not advisable' for him to participate in the upcoming elections. Ahmadinejad's candidacy, contrary to this 'recommendation,' faced opposition from some principlists, and several principlist figures had called for his and Baghaei's disqualification. Nevertheless, in an interview with the American news agency Associated Press, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad emphasized his support for Hamid Baghaei and stated regarding the reason for his candidacy despite the Supreme Leader's recommendation that 'the conditions have fundamentally changed.' He had previously stated that with the candidacy of Ebrahim Raisi, the elections had practically turned into a bipolar situation, and with his candidacy, it would become tripolar. In this context, Kadkhodai rejected the possibility of approving disqualified candidates by government decree.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →