Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Amoli Larijani: It Makes No Sense for the President to Be Responsible for Implementation Everywhere

Jan 31, 2026 January 31, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Sadegh Amoli Larijani, the head of Iran's judiciary, criticized the notion that the President is responsible for implementing the Constitution in all matters, highlighting ambiguities in Article 113 of the Constitution. This statement reflects ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the executive branch, particularly with President Hassan Rouhani.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The judiciary's assertion of independence from the executive branch reflects deeper political tensions in Iran that could shape future governance.

👥 Key Players

Sadegh Amoli Larijani MENTIONED
Head of the Judiciary of Iran
"As the head of the judiciary, he plays a crucial role in interpreting laws and overseeing the legal system in Iran, influencing the balance of power between branches of government."
Hassan Rouhani MENTIONED
President of Iran
"As the President, he is responsible for the executive branch and implementing laws, making him a key figure in the governance and political dynamics of Iran."

📰 What Happened

Sadegh Amoli Larijani criticized the interpretation of Article 113 of the Iranian Constitution, arguing that it is ambiguous regarding the President's responsibility for implementing the Constitution. This statement highlights ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the executive branch.

  • Amoli Larijani emphasized the independence of the judiciary and questioned the extent of presidential power in constitutional implementation.
  • The remarks reflect a history of verbal disputes between Amoli Larijani and President Rouhani.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This debate over constitutional interpretation underscores the power struggle between the judiciary and the executive, which can affect governance and legal processes in Iran.
🌍 Regional: The internal power dynamics in Iran could influence its regional policies and stability, potentially affecting relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: Western nations may view these tensions as indicative of broader governance issues in Iran, impacting diplomatic relations and negotiations.

📚 Background

Iran's political system is characterized by a complex interplay between various branches of government, including the judiciary, executive, and the supreme leadership, which can lead to conflicts over authority and interpretation of laws.

Iranian Constitution Judicial independence in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
As the article comes from a state-affiliated news agency, it may reflect the official stance of the Iranian government and could downplay dissenting views.

Sadegh Amoli Larijani, the head of the judiciary of the Islamic Republic, said on Wednesday in a speech that he sees "ambiguity" in Article 113 of the Iranian Constitution, stating that "it makes no sense for implementation to be the responsibility of the President everywhere." According to the Mehr News Agency, Mr. Amoli Larijani spoke on Wednesday, February 3, during the inauguration of the new building of the Administrative Justice Court, saying: "It is sometimes said that the executive branch, meaning the President, is responsible for implementing the Constitution in all matters. However, there is ambiguity in this constitutional article which states that the President is the highest official of the system after the Leader and is responsible for implementing the Constitution." The criticism from the head of the judiciary comes as Article 113 of the Iranian Constitution explicitly states that the President, after the Leader, is the highest official of the country and is responsible for implementing the Constitution and presiding over the executive branch, except in matters directly related to the Leader. This article was previously worded as follows before the constitutional revision in 1989: "After the Leader, the President is the highest official of the country and is responsible for implementing the Constitution and regulating the relations of the three branches and presiding over the executive branch, except in matters directly related to the Leader." Amoli Larijani also stated: "In principle and apparently, we must accept that this article refers to all clauses of the law and principles of the Constitution, but attention to the independence of the judiciary in the Constitution and the supervisory role of the Guardian Council and the independence of the Expediency Discernment Council shows that it does not mean that the implementation of the Constitution is entirely with the government." He further remarked that "it makes no sense for implementation to be the responsibility of the President everywhere" and added: "The implementation of the principle of the independence of the judiciary cannot be the responsibility of the President, and this ambiguity in this statement must be resolved. The issue of the independence of the judiciary is certain, and Article 57 of the Constitution assigns oversight to the Leader, not to the President or anyone else." According to the Iranian Constitution, the interpretation of the principles of this law is the responsibility of the Guardian Council. Hassan Rouhani, the President, and Sadegh Amoli Larijani, the head of the judiciary, have previously engaged in several verbal disputes. For instance, on November 7, Mr. Rouhani said: "The judiciary must be a refuge for society, and if the salt is healthy, any problem can be prevented, but if the salt becomes corrupt, it becomes very difficult." Mr. Amoli Larijani reacted to these remarks by describing them as "slander and insult to the judiciary" and stated: "If the executive branch becomes corrupt, if the government becomes corrupt, and if the President becomes corrupt, it becomes difficult."

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →