Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Army Commission: American Soldiers Acted Correctly in Attack on Wedding Ceremony in Afghanistan

Feb 12, 2026 February 12, 2026 1 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

An internal U.S. Army commission concluded that American soldiers acted appropriately during a deadly airstrike on a wedding in Afghanistan, which resulted in over 48 civilian deaths, primarily women and children. The report highlights the complexities of combat rules and the tragic consequences of military actions in civilian areas.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. Army's conclusion on the airstrike underscores the tragic consequences of military operations in civilian areas.

👥 Key Players

U.S. Army MENTIONED
Military organization conducting the airstrike
"The U.S. Army's actions and policies in Afghanistan have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and military strategy in the region."
Afghan Government MENTIONED
Local authority reporting civilian casualties
"The Afghan government's response reflects the ongoing challenges of governance and security in Afghanistan, particularly in relation to foreign military presence."

📰 What Happened

An internal U.S. Army investigation concluded that soldiers acted correctly during an airstrike on a wedding ceremony in Afghanistan, which resulted in over 48 civilian deaths. The report claims the attack was a response to enemy fire, despite Afghan officials stating that the gunfire was celebratory.

  • The airstrike occurred on June 30 in Urozgan province.
  • The majority of the casualties were women and children.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This incident may influence Iran's perception of U.S. military actions and its own regional strategies, particularly in relation to Afghanistan.
🌍 Regional: The airstrike could exacerbate tensions between the Afghan government and local populations, impacting regional stability.
🌐 International: Internationally, this raises questions about the rules of engagement for U.S. forces and the implications for civilian safety in conflict zones.

📚 Background

The U.S. has been involved in military operations in Afghanistan since 2001, often facing criticism for civilian casualties during airstrikes. This incident illustrates the ongoing challenges of distinguishing between combatants and civilians.

U.S. military strategy in Afghanistan Civilian casualties in conflict zones
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The report is an internal military investigation, which may present a perspective that aligns with military protocols and justifications.

An internal investigation commission of the U.S. Army states that American soldiers acted correctly during the deadly attack on a wedding ceremony in Afghanistan on June 30. The report, released on Friday, indicates that the crew of an AC-130 combat aircraft acted in accordance with retaliatory regulations during the attack on several locations in Urozgan province, responding to enemy fire that targeted the aircraft from the ground. The report adds that unfortunately, Afghan gunners had chosen civilian and residential areas for their shelling. Afghan officials report that over 48 people were killed in the American airstrike, most of whom were women and children. According to them, the only gunfire at that time was celebratory shots fired in joy.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →