Two American officials announced on Tuesday that projectiles fired at the US airbase in the Conoco gas field in Deir ez-Zor province, Syria, did not hit the base. Earlier, a security source informed Reuters that militias affiliated with the Islamic Republic targeted the base with six projectiles, but all landed around the base. The source added that the US-led coalition responded to this attack with artillery fire. One American official, who requested anonymity, confirmed that the projectiles did not hit the base and no one was injured. He emphasized that these reports are preliminary and may change. The Al-Mayadeen television network, which is close to the Islamic Republic, reported that after this attack, American fighter jets were heavily patrolling the skies over the outskirts of Deir ez-Zor. ConocoPhillips also stated that it is aware of reports of damage to a US and coalition base in eastern Syria known as Conoco, but the company's assets in Syria were relinquished in the early 2000s.
Attack on US Airbase in Syria; US Official: No Projectiles Hit US Base
An attack was launched against a US airbase in Syria by militias linked to the Islamic Republic, but no projectiles hit the base, and there were no injuries reported. The US-led coalition responded with artillery fire. This incident highlights ongoing tensions and retaliatory actions between Iranian-affiliated forces and the US military in the region.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
Militias linked to Iran launched projectiles at a US airbase in Syria, but none hit the base and there were no injuries. The US-led coalition responded with artillery fire.
- Six projectiles were fired at the Conoco airbase but missed their target.
- The US military increased air patrols in response to the attack.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The US has been involved in Syria since 2014, primarily to combat ISIS, but its presence has also put it at odds with Iranian interests in the region.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%