Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Barak: Netanyahu Considered Military Attack on Iran's Nuclear Sites Three Times

Jan 31, 2026 January 31, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Ehud Barak revealed that Benjamin Netanyahu considered military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in 2010, 2011, and 2012, with significant internal debate and opposition from military leaders. The discussions were influenced by concerns over military readiness and potential international repercussions, particularly regarding U.S. involvement. This disclosure highlights the ongoing tensions and strategic calculations surrounding Israel's approach to Iran's nuclear program.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Israel's internal debates on attacking Iran reveal the complexity and risks of military action in the region.

👥 Key Players

Ehud Barak MENTIONED
Former Prime Minister and Defense Minister of Israel
"Barak's revelations provide insight into Israel's internal deliberations on military action against Iran."
Benjamin Netanyahu MENTIONED
Current Prime Minister of Israel
"Netanyahu's leadership and decisions are central to Israel's stance on Iran's nuclear program."
Avigdor Lieberman MENTIONED
Former Foreign Minister of Israel
"Lieberman was a key advocate for military action against Iran during the discussed period."
Gabi Ashkenazi MENTIONED
Former Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces
"Ashkenazi's assessment of military readiness influenced the decision-making process."
Benny Gantz MENTIONED
Former Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces
"Gantz's views on military capability were pivotal during the 2011 deliberations."
Moshe Ya'alon MENTIONED
Former Minister of Strategic Affairs
"Ya'alon played a crucial role in coordinating security strategies concerning Iran."

📰 What Happened

Ehud Barak disclosed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu considered military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in 2010, 2011, and 2012. These plans were ultimately not executed due to internal disagreements and concerns about military readiness and international repercussions.

  • Netanyahu and Lieberman were eager to attack, but faced opposition from military leaders.
  • In 2012, a planned attack was canceled to avoid implicating the U.S. in the operation.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The revelations underscore the persistent threat perception Iran faces from Israel regarding its nuclear program.
🌍 Regional: Potential military action by Israel could destabilize the Middle East and lead to broader conflict.
🌐 International: The involvement of the U.S. and potential international fallout highlight the global stakes of Israel's security decisions.

📚 Background

Israel views Iran's nuclear program as a significant existential threat, leading to ongoing tensions and strategic calculations.

Iran's nuclear program Israel-Iran relations
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article is based on statements from a former Israeli leader, providing a credible but potentially subjective perspective on past events.

Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister and Defense Minister of Israel, revealed that Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister, considered a military attack on Iran's nuclear sites three times in the years 2010, 2011, and 2012. Barak stated that in two instances in 2010 and 2011, the possibility of an attack seemed 'very serious' and 'imminent.' According to a report published on Friday, August 30, citing Barak, secret assessments at the highest levels in the country ended in both cases in 2010 and 2011, particularly due to a lack of sufficient consensus among ministers in sensitive positions and the then Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces. Barak noted that Netanyahu and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman were very eager to carry out the attack. Barak also mentioned that he, along with Netanyahu, proposed the 2010 attack, but during a meeting with the participation of Netanyahu, the Foreign Minister, the Chief of Staff, the heads of Mossad and Shin Bet, and the commander of the military intelligence, General Gabi Ashkenazi, it was stated that he could not confidently say that the military was capable of bearing the consequences of such an operation. Barak said that Netanyahu held a meeting that same day with these seven individuals along with 23 other ministers and officials in sensitive positions, wanting to convince the 30-person meeting to approve the attack plan by hearing a 'yes' from General Ashkenazi. However, after Ashkenazi's response, Barak realized that Netanyahu did not want to face a situation where the Chief of Staff would later claim, 'I told you so!' In 2011, when General Benny Gantz was Chief of Staff, he stated that the military had more and even very satisfactory capabilities, but everyone needed to be resolute, and no one should say that the attack was carried out because of his comments about the military's full readiness. Barak mentioned that this time, Moshe Ya'alon and Yuval Steinitz, who initially seemed decisive, expressed 'regret' at the last moment and 'their knees shook.' Steinitz was the Minister of Finance at that time, and Ya'alon, as the Minister of Strategic Affairs, was responsible for coordinating between ministries, the military, and security agencies regarding Iran. However, according to Barak, another serious consideration for an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities in 2012 was canceled for a 'different reason.' Barak stated that in 2012 everything was ready for an attack, but because a joint maneuver between Israel and the U.S. was on the way, which could create the impression that the U.S. was also partnering with Israel in the attack on Iran, the plan was canceled. Israel's Channel Two reported that the interview with Ehud Barak is part of a documentary film based on Barak's biography, written by Israeli journalists Dani Dor and Ilan Kfir, from hundreds of hours of close conversations with Barak. However, according to this network, the Israeli military censorship has intervened and prevented the release of all the material that the network intended to broadcast based on Barak's statements. Steinitz, who later became the Minister of Strategic Affairs and is currently responsible for the 'Iran file,' expressed strong anger at Barak's revelations. The Haaretz newspaper reported on Saturday, August 31, that Steinitz's office stated that Barak's remarks are 'serious' and he is 'surprised at how the most confidential security meetings in Israel are disclosed and how the country's censorship allows this to be broadcast?' Steinitz added that he is not willing to confirm or deny these statements and that he only expresses his views in confidential meetings. Ya'alon, who has held the Defense Ministry in recent years, also expressed his deep displeasure with Barak's statements, and his office stated to Haaretz that 'half-truths from high-level confidential meetings, especially when there are specific motives behind them, are not of interest to Ya'alon.' The years that Ehud Barak referred to regarding the consideration of a military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities are periods in which Meir Dagan, former head of Mossad, expressed deep concern about 'catastrophic consequences' and 'the occurrence of a regional war just five minutes after the start of Israel's attack on Iran.' Dagan even once stated: 'These attacks could lead to the end of Israel.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →