The organization 'United Against a Nuclear Iran' has proposed a plan to Donald Trump's team titled '100-Day Plan', which outlines a roadmap to limit the Islamic Republic through diplomatic, intelligence, military, and economic measures. Jason Bradesky, the policy director of the organization, noted in an exclusive interview with Voice of America that 'in this 100-day plan, we have suggested to the President of the United States that if the Islamic Republic's proxy forces harm American interests, the U.S. government should respond by directly attacking the IRGC and the Ministry of Intelligence positions in Iran.' Bradesky also stated that Western economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic have severely weakened the regime and Tehran's proxy forces, and in this situation, the continuation of a maximum pressure campaign could completely incapacitate the regime's militias and put the government in a weaker position. He added, 'In a strategic recommendation to Donald Trump's team, we proposed to practically assist in establishing democracy in Iran.' The policy director elaborated that 'according to this proposal, the U.S. government should block the Islamic Republic's financial resources outside of Iran for the benefit of the Iranian people and save and spend for the future of Iran and the current fighters and opponents of the regime.' Jason Bradesky also mentioned the establishment of a strike fund to support striking workers in Iran as another suggestion from the organization to Trump's team, stating that the U.S. government should strengthen the narrative of the regime's opponents in global media and social networks and declassify information related to the repression and corruption of government agents. The 'United Against a Nuclear Iran' organization has proposed in its '100-Day Plan' a comprehensive roadmap for limiting the Islamic Republic, suggesting that the U.S. government should deal with the Islamic Republic like Israel and, while avoiding a large-scale war in the region, strike at the Islamic Republic's important assets. Concurrently with this proposal, two former British politicians also suggested in a report titled 'Change of Policy' that the British government should support Trump's maximum sanctions against the Islamic Republic and stand alongside the U.S. in strengthening the campaign against the Tehran government.
Bradesky Discusses Proposal for Direct Attack on IRGC Positions in '100-Day Plan'
The 'United Against a Nuclear Iran' organization has proposed a '100-Day Plan' to the Trump administration, suggesting direct military action against the IRGC if its proxies harm U.S. interests. This plan aims to weaken the Islamic Republic through economic sanctions and support for democracy in Iran. The proposal highlights a strategic shift in U.S. policy towards Iran and reflects ongoing tensions in the region.
👥 Key Players
⚡ Actions
📰 What Happened
United Against a Nuclear Iran proposed a direct attack on IRGC if proxies harm U.S. interests.
- United Against a Nuclear Iran attack IRGC, Ministry of Intelligence positions in Iran
- Jason Bradesky propose Donald Trump's team
- United Against a Nuclear Iran assist democracy in Iran
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The proposed actions could significantly alter U.S.-Iran relations and impact the Iranian regime's operations.
📝 Key Evidence
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%