Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Colin Powell: I hope America's uninterested allies in the United Nations support a possible war with Iraq

Feb 11, 2026 February 11, 2026 1 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Colin Powell expresses hope that uninterested allies in the UN will support a potential war with Iraq to disarm it. He emphasizes the importance of the UN's credibility and the need for decisive action from the Security Council. This situation is critical as it reflects the U.S. stance on Iraq and the role of international diplomacy.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Powell's remarks highlight the critical juncture for U.S. foreign policy and the UN's role in international conflict resolution.

👥 Key Players

Colin Powell MENTIONED
U.S. Secretary of State
"As a key figure in U.S. foreign policy, his statements influence international relations, particularly regarding military interventions."
United Nations Security Council MENTIONED
International governing body
"Their resolutions and actions can legitimize or delegitimize military actions taken by member states, impacting global diplomacy."
George W. Bush Administration MENTIONED
U.S. government at the time
"Their policies and decisions regarding Iraq directly affect U.S. foreign relations and military strategy."

📰 What Happened

Colin Powell expressed hope that the UN Security Council would support a potential U.S. military intervention in Iraq to enforce disarmament. He emphasized the importance of the UN's credibility in addressing Iraq's compliance with previous resolutions.

  • The UN Security Council had previously issued a resolution in November regarding Iraq's disarmament.
  • Powell indicated that the upcoming actions of the Security Council would determine its role in global affairs.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views U.S. military actions in Iraq as a threat to its own security and regional influence, potentially leading to increased tensions.
🌍 Regional: The potential war could destabilize the Middle East, affecting neighboring countries and their security policies.
🌐 International: A U.S.-led intervention in Iraq could challenge the authority of the UN and alter international norms regarding military intervention.

📚 Background

The U.S. was preparing for possible military action against Iraq, citing concerns over weapons of mass destruction and non-compliance with UN resolutions. This period was marked by significant geopolitical tensions.

Iraq War UN Security Council Resolutions
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
As a statement from a high-ranking U.S. official, it reflects the official U.S. government position, which may be biased towards justifying military action.

Colin Powell, the U.S. Secretary of State, says he hopes America's uninterested allies in the United Nations will support a potential war with Iraq aimed at disarming the country. Mr. Powell states that the moment of determining the authenticity of the UN resolution from November and the credibility of the UN itself is approaching. The November resolution of the UN Security Council promises severe consequences in the event of Iraq's non-compliance. Mr. Powell expresses hope that the Security Council will do whatever is necessary to implement the directives of the resolution. He adds that the Bush administration hopes the Iraq crisis will be resolved peacefully. The White House states that negotiations regarding a new resolution are underway to prescribe the implementation of the previous resolution's contents. Mr. Powell indicates that the manner and quality of the Security Council's actions in the coming days will clarify whether the United Nations has a role in shaping current global developments or not.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →