Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Commander of the IRGC Criticizes Attempts by Some to 'Reform Relations with the U.S.'

Jun 17, 2026 June 17, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The IRGC Commander criticized government officials for attempting to reform relations with the U.S., asserting they cannot be considered revolutionary. He emphasized the importance of recognizing internal threats to the revolution and warned against cultural infiltration. This statement reflects ongoing tensions within Iranian politics regarding relations with the West and the role of the IRGC.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The IRGC's leadership firmly opposes any attempts to improve relations with the U.S., viewing it as anti-revolutionary.

👥 Key Players

Mohammad Ali Jafari (محمد علی جعفری) ACTOR
IRGC Commander
"'Those seeking reforms in the revolutionary path defined by Ayatollah Khamenei cannot be called revolutionary.'"
Hassan Rouhani (حسن روحانی) QUOTED
President of Iran
"'The Basij is not a faction or party.'"
Ali Saeedi QUOTED
Representative of the Supreme Leader in the IRGC
"'Political activity is part of the essence of the IRGC.'"
Rasoul Sanaei Rad QUOTED
Political Deputy of the IRGC
"'The armed forces had not interfered in elections even before the issuance of these policies.'"
Mahmoud Sadeghi QUOTED
Member of Parliament
"'The IRGC's interference in elections has become a fixed practice.'"

⚡ Actions

Mohammad Ali Jafari ANNOUNCE Iranian government officials
"'Those seeking reforms in the revolutionary path defined by Ayatollah Khamenei cannot be called revolutionary.'"
Confidence: 90%
Mohammad Ali Jafari CRITICIZE government officials
"'Some oppose the revolutionary movement and the path outlined by the Leader and want to make reforms.'"
Confidence: 90%
Ayatollah Khamenei WARN Iranian officials
"'Cultural, economic, and social threats are not well felt.'"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

IRGC Commander Jafari criticizes officials seeking reforms in U.S. relations, asserting they are not revolutionary.

  • Mohammad Ali Jafari announce Iranian government officials
  • Mohammad Ali Jafari criticize government officials
  • Ayatollah Khamenei warn Iranian officials

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights internal divisions regarding foreign policy and the revolutionary ideology.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects Iran's stance against U.S. influence in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it signals Iran's resistance to reforming relations with the U.S. despite external pressures.

📚 Background

The IRGC's leadership firmly opposes any attempts to improve relations with the U.S., viewing it as anti-revolutionary.

📝 Key Evidence

"'Some oppose the revolutionary movement and the path outlined by the Leader and want to make reforms.'"
→ Criticism of officials seeking to reform relations with the U.S.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

The Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran criticized the 'indifference' of some government officials and political figures to the warnings of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, as well as their efforts to reform relations with the U.S. and the West, stating that these individuals cannot be considered revolutionary. According to Fars News Agency, Mohammad Ali Jafari emphasized on Thursday, December 4, that those seeking reforms in the 'revolutionary' path defined by Ayatollah Khamenei cannot be called revolutionary. In a speech to Basij forces, he referred to the Supreme Leader's warnings about American 'influence' in Iran, stating that cultural, economic, and social 'threats' are 'not well felt.' Jafari stressed that the conditions of the revolution have 'changed and become complex,' and that 'recognizing today's counter-revolution is very difficult and differs from the armed counter-revolutionaries of the early revolution.' He also noted that the revolution has 'always been harmed from within' and that it is crucial to understand where the internal threats in political, economic, and cultural aspects come from. Jafari emphasized that many do not understand the Supreme Leader's statement that 'Basij is not a faction.' He clarified that while the Basij is not a faction, it is part of the revolutionary front and confronts the anti-revolutionary front. A day before Jafari's remarks, President Hassan Rouhani stated that the Basij is 'not a faction or party' and that according to the general election policies issued by the Supreme Leader, armed forces should not interfere in elections. On Saturday, October 24, the Supreme Leader issued general election policies that prohibit 'supporting candidates' by armed forces, the three branches of government, and intelligence and security institutions. Two days later, Rasoul Sanaei Rad, the political deputy of the IRGC, announced that the armed forces had not interfered in elections even before the issuance of these policies and were only engaged in 'clarification and enlightenment.' Ali Saeedi, the representative of the Supreme Leader in the IRGC, welcomed the issuance of these policies but stated that political activity is 'part of the essence' of the IRGC. Previously, reformist political figures have repeatedly criticized the interference of the Basij and the IRGC in favor of conservatives and supporters of the Supreme Leader in elections. In this context, Mahmoud Sadeghi, a representative from Tehran in the parliament, emphasized on Sunday, October 25, that the IRGC's interference in elections has 'become a fixed practice.' In another part of his speech, Jafari referred to previous warnings from the Supreme Leader about 'cultural infiltration,' stating, 'But some gentlemen and ministers said, which cultural infiltration? and opposed it in practice. How can this person be considered revolutionary?' He questioned how someone who does not act according to the Supreme Leader's economic strategies and does not accept them can consider themselves revolutionary. He stressed that some not only do not pay attention to the Supreme Leader's warnings about relations with the U.S. and the West but are also seeking to reform them, meaning they want to make reforms in the path defined by the revolution; how can we consider them revolutionary? The IRGC commander stated that 'some oppose the revolutionary movement and the path outlined by the Leader and want to make reforms, for example.' Close associates of the Supreme Leader have repeatedly stated that Hassan Rouhani's government seeks to improve relations with the U.S. and the West following the Vienna nuclear agreement and has strongly opposed some of the government's programs in recent weeks, including the establishment of an EU office in Iran. Jafari also mentioned that due to the 'capabilities of Iraqi Mujahideen and Hashd al-Shaabi' in the Mosul operation, there is no need for Iranian forces. However, he indicated that Iranian forces may be present in a 'limited advisory' capacity in the region. Mohammad Baqeri, the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, also stated on Thursday that if the Supreme Leader permits, 'hundreds of thousands of Basijis' are ready to be present in the 'resistance front.' In recent years, reports have emerged about the deaths of several Iranian forces in Iraq, which are significantly less than the reports of Iranian forces killed in Syria. Mohammad Ali Shahidi, the head of the Martyrs Foundation, recently announced that the number of Iranian forces killed in Syria and Iraq, whom he referred to as 'defenders of the shrine,' has exceeded 'one thousand.' The operation to retake Mosul from ISIS began on October 17 (October 26). The Hashd al-Shaabi, an Iranian-backed Iraqi Shiite militia, announced on Wednesday that it had completed the siege of Mosul and, by advancing in western Mosul, reached the Kurdish Peshmerga forces.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →