Condoleezza Rice, the National Security Advisor at the White House, stated that the U.S.-led military attack on Iraq will not hinder America's fight against terrorism. In an interview with Reuters, Ms. Rice noted that President Bush has not yet made a decision regarding how to remove Saddam Hussein from power. The National Security Advisor emphasized that the issues of Iraq and the fight against terrorism will continue to receive special attention. The U.S. government accuses Iraq of not adhering to the 1991 agreement at the end of the Gulf War, which has kept Washington and Baghdad in a hostile state.
❓ Unknown
Condoleezza Rice: Military Attack on Iraq Will Not Hinder U.S. Fight Against Terrorism - 2002-09-07
Feb 12, 2026
February 12, 2026
1 min read
📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway
Condoleezza Rice asserted that a military attack on Iraq would not impede the U.S.'s efforts against terrorism. She mentioned that President Bush has yet to decide on the method to oust Saddam Hussein. This situation is significant as it highlights ongoing U.S. concerns about Iraq's compliance with past agreements.
🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line:
Rice's comments underscore the U.S. commitment to addressing Iraq as part of its broader anti-terrorism strategy.
👥 Key Players
Condoleezza Rice
MENTIONED
National Security Advisor
"As a key advisor to President Bush, her statements reflect U.S. foreign policy priorities, particularly regarding Iraq and terrorism."
Saddam Hussein
MENTIONED
President of Iraq
"His regime is central to U.S. concerns about terrorism and compliance with international agreements."
George W. Bush
MENTIONED
President of the United States
"His decisions on military action against Iraq have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and regional stability."
📰 What Happened
Condoleezza Rice stated that a military attack on Iraq would not impede the U.S. fight against terrorism, while President Bush has yet to decide on how to remove Saddam Hussein from power. This reflects ongoing U.S. concerns about Iraq's compliance with past agreements.
- The U.S. accuses Iraq of violating the 1991 Gulf War agreement.
- The military action against Iraq is part of a broader strategy to combat terrorism.
💡 Why It Matters
🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views U.S. military actions in the region as a direct threat, potentially increasing tensions between the two nations.
🌍 Regional: The military action could destabilize the Middle East, affecting neighboring countries and their relations with the U.S.
🌐 International: The U.S. stance on Iraq influences global perceptions of its commitment to fighting terrorism and international law.
📚 Background
The U.S. has long viewed Iraq as a potential threat due to its past actions and alleged ties to terrorism. The 1991 Gulf War ended with Iraq agreeing to certain conditions, which the U.S. claims it has not met.
U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East
The War on Terror
📡 Source:
NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence:
70%
As a statement from a high-ranking government official, it reflects official U.S. policy rather than independent analysis.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
🌐
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%
📰 Related Coverage
25 min ago •
Global database reveals hidden diversity and potential of deep-sea microbes
30 min ago •
Middle East Anticipates U.S. Reaction to Iran's Latest Escalation
35 min ago •
Brazilian Sedge Reproduces Sexually Without Genetic Reshuffling, Producing Clonal Offspring
35 min ago •
H5N1 Bird Flu Claims Life of Australian Sea Lion, Raises Concerns for Marine Wildlife
45 min ago •