Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🟠 Important ❓ Unknown

Conflicting Reports on the Permanent Ban of Telegram in Iran 'by the End of Farvardin'

Jun 12, 2026 June 12, 2026 4 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Conflicting statements from Iranian officials regarding the potential permanent ban of Telegram have emerged, with some suggesting it will happen by the end of April while others claim the timing is uncertain. This situation reflects ongoing tensions between government authorities and public sentiment, particularly regarding trust in domestic messaging alternatives. The outcome could significantly impact communication in Iran, where Telegram has over 40 million users.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Iranian government is moving towards a permanent ban on Telegram amidst conflicting views from officials.

👥 Key Players

Aladdin Boroujerdi ACTOR
Head of National Security Commission
"At the 'highest level' of government... it has been decided that Telegram will be replaced."
Ramadanali Sobhanifar QUOTED
Parliamentary observer
"The timing of the Telegram ban is not precise."
Ayatollah Khamenei (آیت‌الله خامنه‌ای) QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"He had 'strongly' criticized the lifting of the Telegram ban."
Masoud Pezeshkian QUOTED
Parliament member
"When people do not turn to domestic messaging applications, it indicates that the problem lies with us."

⚡ Actions

Aladdin Boroujerdi ANNOUNCE Telegram
"Telegram will be replaced by 'a national system'."
Confidence: 90%
Ramadanali Sobhanifar CONTRADICT Telegram ban timing
"The timing of the Telegram ban is not precise."
Confidence: 90%
Iranian social media users PROTEST Telegram ban
"Many social media users have expressed their opposition to the ban on Telegram."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Iran's parliament debates permanent ban on Telegram amid conflicting statements from officials.

  • Aladdin Boroujerdi announce Telegram
  • Ramadanali Sobhanifar contradict Telegram ban timing
  • Iranian social media users protest Telegram ban

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the ban on Telegram could impact communication and information dissemination.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects Iran's ongoing struggle with social media control amid unrest.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about human rights and freedom of expression in Iran.

📚 Background

The Iranian government is moving towards a permanent ban on Telegram amidst conflicting views from officials.

📝 Key Evidence

"Given the destructive role that Telegram played in the crises of the past year in the country."
→ This proves the justification for the proposed ban on Telegram.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

Hours after the head of the National Security Commission of the Iranian Parliament announced on Saturday, April 11, that the Telegram application would be permanently banned 'by the end of this month', another representative stated that the timing of this event 'is not clear'. According to the House of Parliament news agency, Aladdin Boroujerdi, the head of this commission, said that at the 'highest level' of government and 'considering the destructive role of Telegram', it has been decided that Telegram will be replaced by 'a national system'. Mr. Boroujerdi did not provide further details about the individual or entity making this decision. In Esfand 1396, some Telegram channels reported that in a meeting of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace attended by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khamenei, he had 'strongly' criticized the lifting of the Telegram ban. However, while Mr. Boroujerdi spoke of 'the end of Farvardin' as the time for the permanent ban on Telegram, another representative, who serves as a 'parliamentary observer in the committee for determining criminal instances', contradicted him. Ramadanali Sobhanifar said: 'The timing of the Telegram ban is not precise, and news should not be pumped into society that disrupts the psychological security of the people.' Shortly after the onset of nationwide protests in Dey, which erupted in dozens of cities, Telegram and Instagram were banned in Iran, and security forces arrested several individuals involved in social media. These two networks were unblocked after a while and with the end of the unrest in the country. However, on January 26, 170 members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly sent a letter to the leaders of the three branches of government, stating that recent gatherings had taken place 'within' foreign messaging applications and called for the replacement of domestic messaging applications instead of these platforms and the regulation of VPNs. Subsequently, reports emerged in Esfand indicating the Supreme Council of Cyberspace's decision to ban Telegram in 1397; however, the public relations manager of the National Cyberspace Center of Iran stated that such information is not accurate. Hassan Rouhani, the President of Iran, had previously stated that his government supports the freedom of social networks and that his Minister of Communications and Information Technology 'will not press the filtering button'. However, it now seems that the decision regarding networks such as Telegram is definitive: according to Aladdin Boroujerdi, 'Telegram will be replaced by a similar national system, and this decision has been made at the highest level.' According to the head of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Parliament, 'Given the destructive role that Telegram played in the crises of the past year in the country', the issue of shutting down Telegram is significant from a 'national security' perspective for the Islamic Republic. While this parliament representative speaks of replacing Telegram with a 'national' and domestic system, there are representatives in the Parliament who disagree with Mr. Boroujerdi and believe that a domestic application cannot replace Telegram. For instance, Masoud Pezeshkian expressed doubt about the use of domestic messaging applications on Friday, April 10, saying: 'When people do not turn to domestic messaging applications, it indicates that the problem lies with us.' Previously, the head of the Citizens' Rights faction in the Parliament had stated that the 'reality' is that the people of Iran do not 'trust' domestic messaging applications. Nevertheless, it seems that the government has resolved this issue by stating, according to Boroujerdi, 'When Telegram is removed from the circuit, people will turn to a national system.' In recent weeks, reports about the potential ban of Telegram have sparked a wave of discussion and protest among the people on social media, leading to the creation of hashtags such as 'domestic messaging application' and 'filtergram'. Many social media users have expressed their opposition to the ban on Telegram through these hashtags, with some declaring that they would never use a domestic messaging application. Currently, among the existing 'domestic' messaging applications in Iran, Soroush, Viber, Gap, IGap, and Bisphone can be mentioned. Telegram is one of the most popular social networks in Iran, with over 40 million Iranian users. As the Iranian Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance has previously stated, 80% of information production in the Persian-speaking virtual space occurs on this network and through 11,000 Telegram channels.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →