Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Continued Opposition to Government's Efforts to Change Wage Determination Formula; A Labor Official: Conditions for Implementing 'Regional Wage' Are Not Met

Feb 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Labor officials in Iran are opposing the government's attempts to implement regional wage determination, arguing that conditions for such a system do not exist. They emphasize that any wage changes must align with inflation and living costs, which have significantly increased under the current government. This issue is critical as it affects the livelihoods of workers amidst rising poverty levels.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The opposition to regional wage determination highlights the struggle between labor rights and government economic policies in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Olia Ali Beigi MENTIONED
Head of the Supreme Council of Islamic Labor Councils
"Represents labor interests and advocates for workers' rights in Iran."
Rasul Gorgij MENTIONED
Head of the Employers' Association of Service Companies in Golestan
"Represents employer interests and opposes regional wage implementation."
Solat Mortazavi MENTIONED
Minister of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare
"Government official advocating for wage negotiations between workers and employers."
Alireza Navaei MENTIONED
Labor activist
"Voices concerns about labor rights and the implications of government policies on workers."

📰 What Happened

Labor officials in Iran are opposing the government's proposal to implement regional wage determination, arguing that the necessary conditions for such a system do not exist. They stress that any wage adjustments must reflect the significant inflation and living costs faced by workers.

  • Inflation in Iran has reportedly reached 250% during the current government's tenure.
  • The proposed regional wages are criticized for not aligning with the actual cost of living, which is estimated to be between 18 to 30 million tomans.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This issue is crucial for the livelihoods of Iranian workers, as rising poverty levels and inflation challenge their ability to meet basic needs.
🌍 Regional: The situation reflects broader economic challenges in the region, potentially influencing labor movements and economic policies in neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view Iran's labor disputes as indicators of social unrest and economic instability, affecting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

Iran has been facing significant economic challenges, including high inflation and poverty rates, which have led to increased scrutiny of labor policies and wage negotiations.

Labor rights in Iran Economic conditions and inflation in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents viewpoints from various stakeholders, including labor officials and activists, providing a balanced perspective on the issue.

The head of the Supreme Council of Islamic Labor Councils in response to the Ministry of Economy's efforts to regionalize wages stated that they would support this action only if Article 41 of the Labor Law, which pertains to inflation and livelihood, is fully implemented. According to Olia Ali Beigi, what is proposed in the Ministry of Economy's plan is a 'misinterpretation' of the law. He emphasized that experience has shown that the conditions for determining regional wages do not exist in the country. Ali Beigi noted that regional wages serve as a pressure lever for the labor group every year during wage determination. Rasul Gorgij, head of the Employers' Association of Service Companies in Golestan, also stated on January 7 that 'this issue will not benefit workers, and we request labor representatives not to accept regional wages.' In November of this year, the 'Research Center of the Iran Chamber of Commerce' called for the implementation of 'regional wages,' and Solat Mortazavi, Minister of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare, opposed 'increasing workers' wages' this year while suggesting that workers negotiate their wage increases with employers. The insistence and pursuit of government and employer officials for the implementation of 'agreed wages' and 'regional wages' has been met with reactions from labor activists and media; for instance, the ILNA news agency reported on January 3 that no place in Iran has a livelihood basket costing less than 18 to 20 million tomans, and those who propose a 3 million toman salary for Sistan and Baluchestan wear suits worth millions. Reports published in Iran mention various figures for the poverty line ranging from 18 to 30 million tomans. Alireza Navaei, a labor activist residing in Paris, told Voice of America: 'The cheapening of labor and the imposition of absolute rights violations on workers have a history as long as the disgraceful rule of the Islamic regime.' While the government and private sector in Iran insist on regionalizing wages and increasing wages by a maximum of 20 percent, Iranian media reported on September 27 that during the two years of Ebrahim Raisi's government, a minimum inflation of '250 percent' has been imposed on people's livelihoods, and 'workers' wages are one-third of the poverty line.' A labor activist stated that regional wages can only be implemented with the participation of 'real representatives' of workers. The intensification of opposition to efforts to change the wage determination formula continues; a labor activist stated: 'Regional wages will not benefit workers.' Another labor activist remarked that if the government behaves like last year, labor representatives should not participate in the 'wage determination' meeting. Media criticism of 'agreed wages' continues; the livelihood basket in Iran is not less than 20 million tomans. Ambiguity surrounds the start of minimum wage negotiations; regional wages were discussed in the Supreme Labor Council.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →