Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Definition of 'Political Crime' and Its Instances Approved by Parliament

Jan 31, 2026 January 31, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian Parliament approved a bill defining 'political crimes' and outlining privileges for political detainees. The bill, which faced government opposition, distinguishes between political crimes and other offenses, with implications for civil rights in Iran. This legislative move is significant as it reflects ongoing debates about political expression and repression in the country.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The approval of the political crime bill highlights the ongoing struggle over political expression and civil rights in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Islamic Consultative Assembly MENTIONED
Iran's Parliament
"They are responsible for passing laws and shaping the legal framework in Iran."
Hassan Rouhani MENTIONED
Former President of Iran
"His government opposed the bill, indicating a divide between the executive branch and the legislature on issues of political expression."
Majid Ansari MENTIONED
Parliamentary Deputy of President Rouhani
"He articulated the government's concerns about the bill, reflecting internal disagreements on political reform."
Kamaleddin Pirmoazzen MENTIONED
Member of Parliament
"He expressed concerns that the bill could limit civil rights, highlighting the contentious nature of political discourse in Iran."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian Parliament approved a bill that defines 'political crimes' and outlines specific privileges for political detainees, despite opposition from the government. The bill distinguishes between political crimes and other offenses, raising concerns about civil rights.

  • The bill specifies that crimes motivated by reforming the country are considered political crimes.
  • It grants certain privileges to political detainees, such as separate detention from ordinary criminals.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This bill reflects the Iranian government's attempt to regulate political dissent while also responding to calls for reform, impacting civil rights and political expression.
🌍 Regional: The approval of this bill could influence political movements in neighboring countries, particularly those facing similar issues of dissent and governance.
🌐 International: Western nations may view this bill as a further indication of Iran's approach to human rights and political freedoms, potentially affecting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

Iran has a complex political landscape where dissent is often met with repression. The definition and treatment of political crimes are contentious issues that reflect broader struggles for civil rights.

Political repression in Iran Civil rights movements in the Middle East
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
As a state media report, the article may reflect the official narrative and downplay dissenting views.

On Sunday, the Islamic Consultative Assembly continued its review of the details of the 'Political Crime' bill, approving the definition of such a 'crime' and the related instances and articles. The general principles of this bill were approved on Tuesday, January 29, despite government opposition. According to Article 1 of this bill, crimes committed 'with the motivation of reforming the affairs of the country against the management and political institutions or domestic or foreign policies of the country, without the perpetrator intending to harm the essence of the regime, are considered political crimes.' On the other hand, according to this bill, 'inciting people to separatism, war, murder, and conflict' is not considered a political crime. This bill also includes some 'privileges' for political detainees, which include 'separate detention from ordinary criminals during detention and imprisonment' and 'prohibition of solitary confinement' for more than 15 days. According to the parliamentary news agency, 'House of the Nation,' on Sunday, February 4, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this bill were approved. Articles 1 and 2 specify crimes that are considered 'political crimes,' while Article 3 identifies crimes that are not considered political. Article 4 assigns criminal courts the responsibility for handling political crimes, and according to Article 5, the determination of a political crime is up to the prosecutor or the court. Article 6 also specifies the privileges that political offenders will enjoy. The general principles of the political crime bill were not presented by the government as a draft but were prepared in the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Parliament and approved in the Parliament session on January 29. Majid Ansari, the parliamentary deputy of President Hassan Rouhani, opposed the bill in that session, stating that from the government's perspective, 'the principle of addressing political crime and defining it is a positive action,' but the government does not consider the Parliament's bill 'comprehensive and prohibitive.' In contrast, supporters of the bill argue that its approval will grant 'political offenders' privileges that ordinary and security offenders do not have. The political crime bill was reviewed and approved in Parliament while many critics argue that no political activity should be considered a crime and that no law can be passed for it. Others, like Kamaleddin Pirmoazzen, a representative from Ardabil, stated during the approval of the general principles last week that 'it seems some representatives want to limit civil rights with this bill; it is better to raise our tolerance threshold instead of being sensitive to criticism and wait for the government to present this issue in the form of a bill at an appropriate time.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →