Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Disqualification of 25 Prominent Lawyers for the Iranian Bar Association Elections

Jan 31, 2026 January 31, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Supreme Disciplinary Court of Judges has disqualified 25 prominent lawyers from the upcoming elections for the Iranian Bar Association's board. This decision affects well-known figures in the legal community and raises concerns about the independence of the Bar Association. The elections are set for March 4, with 116 candidates competing for 18 seats.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The disqualification of prominent lawyers raises serious concerns about the independence of the legal profession in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Supreme Disciplinary Court of Judges MENTIONED
Judicial authority responsible for lawyer qualifications
"They hold significant power over the legal profession in Iran, influencing the independence of lawyers."
Hossein Ali Niri MENTIONED
Signatory of the disqualification notification
"As a key figure in the judicial system, his decisions impact the legal landscape in Iran."
Ghasem Shole-Sadi MENTIONED
One of the disqualified prominent lawyers
"His public response highlights concerns about the independence of the legal profession in Iran."
Bahman Kashavarz MENTIONED
Head of the General Union of Bar Associations
"His perspective reflects the sentiments of the legal community regarding the disqualifications."

📰 What Happened

The Supreme Disciplinary Court of Judges disqualified 25 prominent lawyers from participating in the upcoming elections for the Iranian Bar Association's board. This decision has raised concerns about the independence of the legal profession in Iran.

  • 25 lawyers were disqualified out of 144 candidates for the Bar Association elections.
  • Elections are scheduled for March 4, with 116 candidates competing for 18 seats.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This disqualification undermines the independence of the legal profession, which is essential for a fair judicial system.
🌍 Regional: It may affect perceptions of Iran's legal integrity among neighboring countries and impact regional diplomatic relations.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a further erosion of civil liberties in Iran, influencing foreign relations and sanctions discussions.

📚 Background

The Iranian Bar Association elections are a significant event that reflects the state of legal independence in Iran. Disqualifications of candidates can indicate governmental control over the judiciary.

Judicial independence in Iran Human rights in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents factual information regarding the disqualifications without overt bias, but the implications may vary based on the reader's perspective.

The Supreme Disciplinary Court of Judges, in a notification signed by Hossein Ali Niri, has disqualified 25 prominent lawyers from participating in the board of directors of the Iranian Bar Association. According to the notification issued by Mr. Niri, out of 144 candidates for the 29th election of the board, the qualifications of these 25 lawyers were not 'verified' based on certain provisions of the law regarding the issuance of law licenses, as well as investigations conducted. Among the names of those disqualified are Abdol-Samad Khormshahi, Ramadan Hajji Mashhadi, Farideh Ghayrat, Majid Pourastad, Seyyed Mahmoud Mostafavi Kashani, Saleh Nikbakht, and Ghasem Shole-Sadi. On March 4 of this year, 116 approved candidates will compete for 18 seats on the board of this independent legal entity. The elections for this legal institution, held every two years, faced similar circumstances during the 28th term when it was announced that 29 candidate lawyers were disqualified just as President Hassan Rouhani emphasized the independence of lawyers as a 'fundamental principle' during a meeting with members of the boards of the Iranian Bar Associations. This issue surprised and bewildered lawyers, according to Bahman Kashavarz, the head of the General Union of Bar Associations. Ghasem Shole-Sadi, one of the disqualified lawyers, confirmed his disqualification in an interview with Radio Farda, describing the action of the Supreme Disciplinary Court of Judges as contrary to the principle of the independence of the Bar Association.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →