Does Iran Need a Leader?

For some, he is the "Guardian" and the "Deputy of the Hidden Imam" who sits on the "sacred" throne of leadership to protect the Islamic system from any harm. For others, he is a "Sultan" with a new appearance and a symbol of "autocracy" who sits on the caliphate's throne to maintain a "non-democratic" government structure. Between these two poles, there exists a spectrum of critics and defenders with differing opinions. However, there is no doubt among anyone that he is the "final word." Does Iran need a "final word"? To what extent is the existence of an institution and authority called "leadership" necessary for Iran given today's characteristics and requirements? How realistic is the idea of Iran without a leader? In this segment of the Sixth Hour program, you will hear a debate between a critic and a defender of the leadership institution, along with the opinions of Radio Farda's audience. Majid Mohammadi believes that the leadership institution is harmful to Iran in every aspect and in any form. In contrast, Ali Alizadeh evaluates Ayatollah Khamenei's policies, especially in the area of national security, as successful and positive, stating that the criticisms directed at him over the years have not been fair.