Donald Rumsfeld, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, denies the published report claiming that the U.S. intends to establish long-term military relations with Iraq to access key bases. On Monday, Mr. Rumsfeld, while speaking with reporters at the Pentagon, described the New York Times front page article as completely false. Following his remarks, he stated that the issue of a temporary or permanent U.S. military presence in Iraq has not been discussed in any meetings among senior officials. He expressed concern that the New York Times article could create a false impression in the minds of Iraqis, who are already worried about a continuous U.S. military presence in their country.
Donald Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, Denies New York Times Front Page Article - 2003-04-22
Donald Rumsfeld denied a New York Times article suggesting the U.S. plans to establish long-term military relations with Iraq. He emphasized that the issue of U.S. military presence has not been discussed among senior officials. This denial is significant as it addresses Iraqi concerns about ongoing U.S. military involvement.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
Donald Rumsfeld publicly denied a New York Times article that claimed the U.S. planned to establish long-term military relations with Iraq. He emphasized that discussions about a permanent U.S. military presence had not occurred among senior officials.
- Rumsfeld described the New York Times article as completely false.
- He expressed concern about the potential negative impact on Iraqi perceptions of U.S. intentions.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 led to significant military and political changes in the region, raising concerns about long-term U.S. military involvement.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%