Tehran, IRNA – Robert Fantina, an American author and journalist, says that the US administration is not interested in peace and is pursuing power and profit through its war against Iran, arguing that Washington’s military actions violate international law and that diplomacy is the only realistic path to ending the conflict.
IRNA is Iran's official state news agency. This is a translation of that outlet's own report; it is the outlet's account, not Artesh's finding.
See what Iranian state media is saying today.
❓ Unknown
US Pursues Power and Profit Over Peace in Iran Conflict, Says Journalist
1w ago
October 21, 2026
1 min read
📰 IRNA English
📋 Key Takeaway
Robert Fantina, an American journalist, claims that the US is not interested in peace with Iran, instead seeking power and profit through military actions that violate international law. He emphasizes that diplomacy is the only viable solution to the ongoing conflict. This perspective highlights the challenges Iran faces in its relations with the US.
🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line:
The article underscores the ongoing debate about the US's role in Iran and the need for diplomatic engagement.
👥 Key Players
Robert Fantina
MENTIONED
American author and journalist
"His views reflect a critical perspective on US foreign policy towards Iran, influencing public discourse."
US Administration
MENTIONED
Government of the United States
"Their policies and military actions significantly impact Iran's geopolitical landscape and international relations."
📰 What Happened
Robert Fantina argues that the US is prioritizing power and profit over peace in its dealings with Iran. He claims that the US's military actions are unlawful and advocates for diplomacy as the only solution to the conflict.
- Fantina asserts that US military actions violate international law.
- He emphasizes that diplomacy is the only realistic path to resolving the conflict.
💡 Why It Matters
🇮🇷 For Iran: This perspective highlights the internal challenges Iran faces in negotiating with a perceived adversary focused on military dominance.
🌍 Regional: The US-Iran conflict has broader implications for stability in the Middle East, affecting neighboring countries and regional alliances.
🌐 International: The US's approach to Iran raises concerns among other nations regarding international law and the efficacy of military solutions in conflict resolution.
📚 Background
The US and Iran have had a contentious relationship since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, characterized by sanctions, military threats, and diplomatic standoffs.
US-Iran relations
International law and military intervention
📡 Source:
OPPOSITION
📊 Confidence:
70%
As a journalist with a critical stance on US policies, Fantina's views may reflect a particular ideological bias against military intervention.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
🌐
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 100%
📰 Related Coverage
Just now •
Trump: Negotiations with Iran are progressing well but are not trustworthy
23 min ago •
New Gains for Iran from the U.S.; The Story of the Capture of Two MQM-170…
26 min ago •
US Accuses North Korea in $6.3 Billion Cyber Theft Case
35 min ago •
Reyhaneh, Mahsa, and 2 Incredible Events!
40 min ago •