Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Georgia's Parliament Speaker Signs Controversial Law Limiting LGBTQ Rights

Jan 24, 2026 January 24, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Speaker of Georgia's Parliament signed a controversial law that severely limits LGBTQ rights, leading to protests and a political standoff with the President. This law, which includes prohibitions on same-sex marriage and adoption, reflects the polarized political landscape in Georgia and has drawn international criticism.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The signing of this law marks a significant step back for LGBTQ rights in Georgia and reflects deep political divisions within the country.

👥 Key Players

Shalva Papuashvili MENTIONED
Speaker of the Parliament of Georgia
"As a leading figure in the ruling 'Georgian Dream' party, he plays a crucial role in shaping legislation and political discourse in Georgia."
Salome Zourabichvili MENTIONED
President of Georgia
"As the head of state, she represents a counterbalance to the ruling party and has shown opposition to the controversial law."
Georgian Dream party MENTIONED
Ruling political party in Georgia
"They hold the majority in parliament and are responsible for the introduction and passage of the 'Family Values' bill."
LGBTQ Rights Groups MENTIONED
Advocates for sexual and gender minorities
"They are crucial in raising awareness and opposing legislation that threatens the rights of LGBTQ individuals."

📰 What Happened

The Speaker of Georgia's Parliament signed a law that restricts LGBTQ rights, including prohibiting same-sex marriage and adoption. This has sparked protests and highlighted the political divide in the country.

  • The law was passed with 84 votes in favor and no opposition votes.
  • Protests erupted outside parliament following the bill's approval.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The situation in Georgia may resonate with Iranian activists and LGBTQ communities, highlighting the struggles against oppressive laws.
🌍 Regional: This law could influence other countries in the region with similar political climates and attitudes towards LGBTQ rights.
🌐 International: The law has drawn significant criticism from Western nations, potentially affecting Georgia's relationships with these countries.

📚 Background

Georgia has been experiencing increasing polarization in its political landscape, particularly regarding social issues like LGBTQ rights. The 'Family Values' bill is part of a broader trend of conservative legislation in the region.

LGBTQ rights in Eastern Europe Political polarization in Georgia
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a factual account of events, but the interpretation of the law's implications may vary based on the reader's perspective.

Shalva Papuashvili, the Speaker of the Parliament of Georgia from the 'Georgian Dream' party, signed the controversial 'Family Values' bill on October 4, which, according to human rights groups and opponents, severely restricts the rights of sexual and gender minorities. This bill was approved in the country's parliament with 84 votes in favor and no votes against. Earlier, after the bill was passed on September 18, opponents boycotted the parliament, and protesters gathered outside the parliament building. On Wednesday, October 2, Salome Zourabichvili, the President of Georgia, refrained from signing the bill to return it to parliament according to the Georgian constitution. The policies of the ruling 'Georgian Dream' party are in conflict with Salome Zourabichvili and the political opposition, which has boycotted parliament sessions for months ahead of next month's elections. On September 18, a group of people in Georgia protested against the new law in front of the parliament building in downtown Tbilisi. They held placards stating that this law ignores the real problems of Georgian families. The law, introduced as 'Family Values and Protection of Minors,' amends 18 previous laws, including those related to freedom of expression and media. The government refers to these changes as 'reforms.' One important aspect of this law is the prohibition of gatherings where individuals can express a gender different from their 'biological sex.' Shalva Papuashvili, while signing this law, attacked the President and his opponents for not supporting it, stating, 'It is very interesting that the worthless opposition leader, who has now become a popular president, is unwilling to sign a law that protects the most valuable thing for a human being, namely family and children.' Although the Speaker of Parliament had the legal right to sign this law, his action reflects the highly polarized political climate in Georgia. This law must now be published in the official journal of Georgian laws and will come into effect 60 days later. The 'Family Values' bill proposed by the ruling 'Georgian Dream' party includes prohibiting same-sex marriage and adoption by same-sex couples. This law also prevents media from writing or showing anything about same-sex relationships. The President of Georgia opposed this law and vetoed it, but the ruling party turned it into law regardless of public protests and international concerns. In response to criticism from Western countries, Shalva Papuashvili stated, 'I know some foreign countries do not like this law, but we Georgians have never feared the opinions of others. When faith, reason, and love for our country tell us that something is right, we do it, even if the rest of the world thinks wrong.' This law is one of the most controversial laws in Georgia targeting sexual minorities, following the 'Foreign Agents Law,' which allows the government to restrict the activities of media and human rights groups receiving funding from abroad. The passage of this law has led to significant protests in Georgia, and the United States and Western countries have expressed their concerns.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →