The Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister stated in an interview that, referring to Washington's violation of commitments in the ceasefire memorandum, it is the U.S. that needs to show flexibility in the negotiations to end the conflict, not Iran.
ISNA is a semi-official Iranian news agency (Iranian Students News Agency). This is a translation of that outlet's own report; it is the outlet's account, not Artesh's finding.
See what Iranian state media is saying today.
❓ Unknown
Gharibabadi: The U.S. Must Show Flexibility in Negotiations, Not Iran
2w ago
October 13, 2026
1 min read
📰 ISNA
📋 Key Takeaway
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister has emphasized that the U.S. should be the one to show flexibility in negotiations regarding the end of the conflict, highlighting Washington's failure to uphold its commitments. This statement reflects ongoing tensions in U.S.-Iran relations and the complexities of diplomatic negotiations.
🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line:
Iran is calling for the U.S. to take responsibility for its commitments in negotiations, which could influence future diplomatic efforts.
👥 Key Players
Ali Gharibabadi
MENTIONED
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister
"As a senior diplomat, he plays a crucial role in shaping Iran's foreign policy and negotiating stance, particularly in relation to the U.S."
United States
MENTIONED
Key negotiating party in the conflict
"The U.S. is a significant global power whose policies directly impact Iran's economy and regional stability."
📰 What Happened
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister stated that the U.S. needs to demonstrate flexibility in negotiations to resolve the conflict, pointing out Washington's failure to adhere to its commitments. This highlights the ongoing tensions between the two nations.
- The U.S. has been accused of violating commitments in a ceasefire memorandum.
- Iran asserts that it is the U.S. that should adjust its stance in negotiations.
💡 Why It Matters
🇮🇷 For Iran: This statement reinforces Iran's position in negotiations and domestic narratives about U.S. reliability and commitment.
🌍 Regional: The outcome of these negotiations could impact regional stability and the dynamics of power in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Internationally, this reflects the broader challenges in U.S. foreign policy and its relations with adversarial states.
📚 Background
The U.S. and Iran have a long history of conflict, particularly over nuclear issues and regional influence, making negotiations complex and fraught with mistrust.
U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations
Middle East geopolitical tensions
📡 Source:
STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence:
70%
As a statement from an Iranian official, it reflects the government's perspective and may downplay or omit criticisms of Iran's own policies.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
🌐
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%
📰 Related Coverage
35 min ago •
Reports of Bombing of National Liberation Army Camp in Colombia
56 min ago •
Poland's President Engages in Crisis Talks Amid Constitutional Court Dispute
57 min ago •
North Korea's New Action: Tactical Ballistic Missile with Cluster Warhead Tested
57 min ago •
Kepler and TESS Discover Ultra-Short-Period Exoplanets Challenging Our Understanding
1h ago •