Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Government Calls Court of Audit Report 'Incorrect and Causing Public Confusion'

Jul 13, 2026 July 13, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian government has rejected a report from the Court of Audit that accused it of financial mismanagement and selling the future, calling the report misleading. The Planning and Budget Organization also criticized the report as one-sided and unproven. This dispute highlights ongoing tensions between government institutions regarding financial accountability and transparency.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Iranian government is facing significant scrutiny over financial practices.

👥 Key Players

Hassan Rouhani (حسن روحانی) ACCUSED
President of Iran
"'selling the future' and financial disorder"
Adel Azar (عادل آذر) QUOTED
Head of Iran's Court of Audit
"'The government is selling the future, and this is a sign of public financial disorder.'"
Mohammad Baqer Nobakht (محمد باقر نوبخت) ACTOR
Head of Planning and Budget Organization
"'Our performance in the treasury shows how much has been deposited.'"
Bijan Zanganeh AFFILIATED
Oil Minister
"attended the meeting with Nobakht"

⚡ Actions

Hassan Rouhani's government ANNOUNCE Court of Audit report
"'causing public confusion'"
Confidence: 90%
Adel Azar ACCUSE Hassan Rouhani's government
"'selling the future' and financial disorder"
Confidence: 90%
Mohammad Baqer Nobakht RESPOND Court of Audit report
"'one-sided' and unproven"
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iran's government disputes Court of Audit report on financial disorder and budget violations.

  • Hassan Rouhani's government announce Court of Audit report
  • Adel Azar accuse Hassan Rouhani's government
  • Mohammad Baqer Nobakht respond Court of Audit report

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights internal government conflicts and financial mismanagement.
🌍 Regional: Because it may affect Iran's economic stability and relations with neighboring countries.
🌐 International: Because it could influence perceptions of Iran's governance and economic policies.

📚 Background

The Iranian government is facing significant scrutiny over financial practices.

📝 Key Evidence

"'The government is selling the future, and this is a sign of public financial disorder.'"
→ Accusation of financial mismanagement
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

Two days after the head of Iran's Court of Audit accused Hassan Rouhani's government of financial disorder and 'selling the future,' the government spokesman described the report as 'causing public confusion.' On Friday, the Planning and Budget Organization, which is part of the government, had issued an official statement calling the report 'one-sided' and unproven. The head of the Court of Audit, Adel Azar, in a television interview last Thursday, accused Rouhani's government of financial disorder and 'selling the future,' stating that the government's debt had increased by '229 percent.' The Tasnim news agency, close to the Revolutionary Guards, quoted Azar's interview saying, 'The government is selling the future, and this is a sign of public financial disorder.' Azar also mentioned that in comparison to the previous year, 1394, the level of violations and deviations from the budget law by the government in 1395 had increased. The budget audit report, which is prepared annually by the Court of Audit, essentially reviews the financial performance of each government over the course of a year. In response to this negative remark, Mohammad Baqer Nobakht, head of the Planning and Budget Organization and also the spokesman for Rouhani's government, on Saturday, February 7, described the Court of Audit's report as 'causing public confusion and being exploited by hostile media.' According to the official news agency of the Islamic Republic, IRNA, Nobakht also complained about why the Court of Audit had not informed the Planning and Budget Organization about the 'existing ambiguities' so that they could respond. Azar stated that Rouhani's government had ignored '55 percent of budget regulations' in 1394, but this figure had increased to '65 percent' in 1395. Nobakht commented on the non-deposit of certain revenues into the treasury mentioned in the Court of Audit report, saying, 'Our performance in the treasury shows how much has been deposited, and the documents are available, and the Court of Audit can request documents from us.' Nobakht, who had organized a press conference on Saturday to respond to the Court of Audit, attended the meeting with Bijan Zanganeh, the oil minister, and addressed most of the criticisms raised by the head of the Court of Audit. The head of the Court of Audit also named the National Gas Company of Iran as 'the most undisciplined state company in 1395,' stating that 'about 24 trillion tomans in revenue from oil subsidiary companies, including the National Gas Company, the Refining and Distribution Company, and refineries, were not deposited into the treasury in 1395.' In response to this criticism, the head of the Planning and Budget Organization said, 'If there was a violation in the 1395 budget, it should be sent to the prosecutor's office and then follow the established procedures, not for the Court of Audit to claim that an agency has not deposited thousands of billions of tomans and not even ask questions to clarify ambiguities, which has its own consequences.' Previously, the Planning and Budget Organization had also responded in detail to each of the criticisms raised by the Court of Audit in its official statement, concluding that 'despite all the limitations and the remaining effects of the oppressive sanctions of bullying powers, the trend of economic and budget indicators in 1395 was positive and defensible.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →