Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Government Retreats from Transferring Persepolis Club to Social Security; Two Private Banks Enter Negotiations

Feb 4, 2026 February 4, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian government has reversed its decision to transfer the Persepolis football club to pension funds after widespread protests, now negotiating with two private banks for the transfer. This shift comes amid criticism from pensioners' unions and concerns over the financial viability of these clubs. The situation is significant as it highlights ongoing tensions between the government and pensioners, as well as challenges in the management of state-owned sports entities.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The government's retreat from transferring Persepolis to pension funds underscores the significant public discontent and the complexities of managing state-owned sports entities.

👥 Key Players

Ali Bahadori Jahromi MENTIONED
Government Spokesperson
"He represents the government's position and decisions regarding the management of state assets, including sports clubs."
Kiomars Hashemi MENTIONED
Minister of Sports and Youth
"He oversees sports policy in Iran and is involved in the negotiations regarding the transfer of football clubs."
Solat Mortazavi MENTIONED
Minister of Labor, Cooperatives, and Social Welfare
"He is responsible for pension funds and labor issues, directly impacting the interests of pensioners."
National Pensioners' Union MENTIONED
Advocacy Group
"They represent the interests of pensioners and have voiced strong opposition to the government's plans."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian government has reversed its decision to transfer the Persepolis football club to pension funds after significant protests, now negotiating with two private banks for the transfer instead. This change comes amid criticism from pensioners' unions concerned about the financial implications of such a move.

  • The government initially planned to transfer Persepolis and Esteghlal clubs to pension funds as part of debt settlement.
  • Widespread protests from pensioners' unions led to the government's decision to negotiate with private banks instead.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This situation reflects the ongoing tensions between the Iranian government and pensioners, highlighting issues of financial management and public trust.
🌍 Regional: The management of sports clubs can influence regional perceptions of governance and economic stability in Iran.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a sign of internal dissent and the challenges faced by the Iranian government in managing state assets.

📚 Background

Iranian football clubs like Persepolis and Esteghlal are historically significant but financially troubled, often reliant on government support. The management of these clubs is intertwined with broader economic issues and public sentiment.

Iranian sports management Pension fund issues in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reflects the official stance of the Iranian government and may downplay dissenting opinions or criticisms.

Following widespread protests, particularly from pensioners' unions, officials of the Islamic Republic have retreated from their decision to transfer Tehran's Persepolis Club to pension funds, announcing the offering of the Persepolis and Esteghlal clubs to two private banks. On Wednesday, March 14, the government spokesperson emphasized the cancellation of the transfer of Persepolis to pension funds and stated that the government is negotiating with two non-governmental banks for the transfer of the two football clubs. Ali Bahadori Jahromi, without referencing the criticisms raised by media, experts, and pensioners' unions, cited 'the emergence of other options' within the non-governmental banks as the reason for the government's retreat from transferring the Persepolis Club to Social Security. He did not mention the names of these two private banks or the details of the negotiations with them. Meanwhile, Kiomars Hashemi, the Minister of Sports and Youth, announced that the government has issued a permit for the transfer of the Esteghlal and Persepolis clubs to two non-governmental banks. Kiomars Hashemi stated that the government issued this permit on Wednesday to facilitate the transfer of these two clubs to non-governmental banks. The government's withdrawal from its previous decision comes at a time when the Cabinet had approved the transfer of the Persepolis Club to the 'Rural and Nomadic Insurance Fund,' the Social Security Organization, and the 'National Pension Fund' as part of settling the government's debts to these companies, which was communicated on March 11. Following this decision, the National Pensioners' Union opposed the 'forced sale of bankrupt sports clubs to the Social Security Organization.' The Iranian Pensioners' Council also addressed the Minister of Labor, stating that 'imposing this club on our funds is not only not an honor but a blatant violation of the interests of pension funds.' Solat Mortazavi, the Minister of Labor, Cooperatives, and Social Welfare, had previously stated, 'If we have the honor of owning shares in Persepolis, we will be present with strength.' The joint and state ownership of the Esteghlal and Persepolis clubs is one of the significant obstacles for these clubs to obtain the necessary licenses for 'professional' clubs in Asia, which has become a challenge for Iranian football in recent years due to the stringent requirements of the Asian Football Confederation. According to Iranian media, April 1, 2024, is the last deadline for clubs to submit documents for obtaining professional licenses. Meanwhile, the government's efforts to transfer these two clubs come at a time when many observers evaluate sports clubs, especially Persepolis, as 'costly and loss-making.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →