Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Governor of the Central Bank of Iran Confirmed the Authenticity of Financial Documents Leaked Against Raefipour's Institute

Jan 24, 2026 January 24, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Governor of the Central Bank of Iran confirmed the authenticity of leaked financial documents against Ali Akbar Raefipour's Masaf institute, labeling the leak as illegal. This controversy arises amid low voter turnout in the recent parliamentary elections and accusations of money laundering involving significant sums. The situation highlights ongoing political tensions and the scrutiny of financial practices within Iranian institutions.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The authenticity of leaked financial documents against a political figure highlights serious allegations of corruption amid a politically charged environment.

👥 Key Players

Mohammad Reza Farzin MENTIONED
Governor of the Central Bank of Iran
"As the head of Iran's central banking authority, he oversees financial regulations and monetary policy, making his statements significant in the context of financial integrity and governance."
Ali Akbar Raefipour MENTIONED
Owner of the Masaf institute
"His institute is at the center of the financial controversy, and he is a political figure with influence in recent elections."
Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf MENTIONED
Political figure and former speaker of the Iranian Parliament
"As a prominent politician, he is involved in the ongoing political tensions and accusations surrounding financial misconduct."
Jalil Mohibi MENTIONED
Political figure and member of the Scientific Board of the Research Center of the Parliament
"His involvement in publishing the leaked documents indicates a connection to political maneuvering and the investigation of financial practices."

📰 What Happened

The Central Bank Governor confirmed that leaked financial documents related to Ali Akbar Raefipour's Masaf institute are authentic, labeling the leak as illegal. This situation has arisen amid accusations of money laundering and political tensions ahead of parliamentary elections.

  • The leaked documents allege that significant funds were funneled to various individuals and companies from the Masaf institute.
  • The controversy is linked to low voter turnout in recent parliamentary elections and accusations of financial misconduct.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This controversy underscores the challenges of corruption and governance in Iran, impacting public trust in institutions.
🌍 Regional: The political instability could affect regional relationships and Iran's standing among neighboring countries.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as indicative of broader issues within Iran's political system, affecting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

Iran has faced ongoing issues with corruption and governance, particularly in financial institutions, which are often scrutinized in the context of political rivalries.

Corruption in Iran Political dynamics in Iranian elections
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
As a state media report, the article may reflect the government's perspective and could downplay or omit criticisms of state institutions.

The Governor of the Central Bank of Iran confirmed the authenticity of leaked financial documents against the 'Masaf' institute belonging to Ali Akbar Raefipour, calling the act 'illegal' and 'incorrect.' Mohammad Reza Farzin threatened on Saturday, May 22, that 'if it is proven that the financial information of this institute was sent by the banking network, those responsible for this illegal act will be dealt with severely.' He stated that after learning about the publication of the financial information of this institute, he instructed two deputy directors and the security department of the Central Bank to investigate 'how access' and 'illegal publication' of these documents occurred. In the days leading up to the second round of the parliamentary elections, which were held on Friday with very low participation, some individuals and groups close to Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf published documents indicating that since 2022, about '100 billion tomans' had been deposited into the charity institute 'Masaf' under the title of 'public donations' and distributed among various individuals and companies. According to these documents, several accounts known as 'value-oriented' active on social media, which publish content against Qalibaf, were among the recipients of funds from the Masaf institute. Individuals and Twitter accounts affiliated with 'Masaf' had made financial disclosures against Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and his associates in the days leading up to the first round of elections. Ali Akbar Raefipour, who supported candidates in both rounds of the recent parliamentary elections with a list known as 'Sobh Iran,' accused the whistleblowers in a video of accessing people's bank accounts through security agencies and threatened to file a complaint. Meanwhile, Mohammad Reza Farzin did not mention the possible role of 'security agencies' in this disclosure, considering access to individuals' and institutions' banking information 'without judicial authorization' a crime. Jalil Mohibi, a figure close to Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf and former secretary of the 'Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice' headquarters, who published these documents on his Telegram channel, reacted to the Central Bank Governor's position on X, stating, 'Instead of dealing with those who have cooperated with the banks' investigation committee, you should deal with those who have not fulfilled their duties regarding money laundering.' He, who is a member of the 'Scientific Board' of the Research Center of the Parliament and has also played a role in drafting the bill known as 'Hijab and Chastity,' did not provide further explanation about this 'investigation committee' and his connection to it. According to Iranian media reports, in the 11th Parliament, two separate investigation committees were supposed to investigate the performance of state banks and private credit institutions, but no reports from either of these committees were publicly released.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →