Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

IAEA Reports Increase in Iran's 60% Enriched Uranium; Grossi Optimistic About Meeting with President Pezeshkian

Jun 22, 2026 June 22, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The IAEA has reported a significant increase in Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, raising concerns about its proximity to weapons-grade levels. Rafael Grossi, the IAEA Director General, hopes to meet with Iran's new president, Masoud Pezeshkian, to discuss cooperation, but tensions remain high with stalled negotiations. This situation is critical as it affects international nuclear non-proliferation efforts.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The increase in enriched uranium stockpile poses significant risks for regional and global security.

👥 Key Players

Rafael Grossi ACTOR
Director General of IAEA
"Mr. Grossi congratulated Mr. Pezeshkian on his election as Iran's new president."
Masoud Pezeshkian TARGET
President of Iran
"Mr. Grossi expressed hope regarding his upcoming trip to Iran."
Ali Khamenei (علی خامنه‌ای) QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"'there is no contradiction in interacting with the enemy in some places.'"
International Atomic Energy Agency (آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی) ACTOR
Nuclear oversight body
"the IAEA's report indicates that the stockpile of uranium at levels close to the threshold necessary for building an atomic bomb has been continuously increasing."

⚡ Actions

IAEA REPORT Iran
"Iran possessed 'more than 164 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%' as of August 27 this year."
Confidence: 90%
Rafael Grossi HOPE Masoud Pezeshkian
"Mr. Grossi stated that he hopes to establish 'a constructive dialogue that quickly leads to tangible results'."
Confidence: 90%
Ali Khamenei WARN U.S.
"'we should not have hope and trust in them.'"
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

IAEA reports Iran's enriched uranium stockpile increases, Grossi seeks constructive dialogue with new president.

  • IAEA report Iran
  • Rafael Grossi hope Masoud Pezeshkian
  • Ali Khamenei warn U.S.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the increase in uranium stockpile may impact Iran's negotiations and international relations.
🌍 Regional: Because it raises concerns among neighboring countries about nuclear proliferation.
🌐 International: Because it may affect global nuclear non-proliferation efforts and U.S.-Iran relations.

📚 Background

The increase in enriched uranium stockpile poses significant risks for regional and global security.

📝 Key Evidence

"Iran possessed 'more than 164 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%' as of August 27 this year."
→ This proves Iran's increasing stockpile of enriched uranium.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

According to reports, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has indicated in two confidential reports that Iran's stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels has increased, and he has expressed hope for an upcoming meeting with Iran's new president to achieve tangible results. According to the IAEA's confidential report, which was reflected in several news agencies including the Associated Press on Thursday, September 8, Iran possessed 'more than 164 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%' as of August 27 this year. This amount is about 22 kilograms more than what was reported three months ago. Uranium enriched to 60% is only one technical step away from the 90% enrichment level used for weapons. The IAEA's report, which is the latest quarterly report from this international body, indicates that the stockpile of uranium at levels close to the threshold necessary for building an atomic bomb has been continuously increasing in Iran, while discussions to improve cooperation between Iran and the IAEA have also stalled. The new IAEA report also notes that Iran has yet to respond to questions regarding the origin and location of uranium particles found near Tehran. This confidential report comes as Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, stated on September 6 during a meeting with members of the fourteenth government that 'there is no contradiction in interacting with the enemy in some places, but we should not have hope and trust in them.' These remarks were interpreted as favorable for renewed negotiations with the U.S., while the Supreme Leader also set red lines for any negotiations under President Pezeshkian's administration, warning that the U.S. is not trustworthy. The new report from the IAEA's Director General was released less than ten days before the start of the IAEA Board of Governors meeting. Meanwhile, AFP reported that Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the IAEA, expressed hope in another confidential report to the Board of Governors regarding his upcoming trip to Iran. According to this report, Mr. Grossi stated that he hopes to establish 'a constructive dialogue that quickly leads to tangible results' during his meeting with Masoud Pezeshkian, the new president of Iran. Mr. Grossi congratulated Mr. Pezeshkian on his election as Iran's new president earlier in August and announced his readiness to travel to Tehran for 'resuming dialogue and cooperation between the Agency and Iran.' Although the Islamic Republic's president indicated his agreement to meet with Mr. Grossi in response to this message, there has been no dialogue with the IAEA Director General since then. The previous IAEA report, presented in June, led to a resolution by the Board of Governors that called on Iran to stop enrichment above the limits set in the JCPOA and to pursue full cooperation with the Agency's inspectors. This resolution, drafted by Britain, France, and Germany, also requested that Iran provide credible answers to the Agency's inspectors regarding suspicious aspects of its nuclear program.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →