Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

If Women Want Equality, Why Do They Accept Dowries?

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 2 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The article discusses the debate over dowries in Iran, with activists divided on whether they empower women or commodify them. Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh argues that dowries reinforce class inequalities, while Zhila Mohaddeshari'atpanahi defends them as romantic gifts. This debate is significant as it reflects broader issues of women's rights and societal values in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The dowry debate in Iran underscores the ongoing struggle between tradition and gender equality.

👥 Key Players

Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh MENTIONED
Women's rights activist
"She is a prominent voice in advocating for women's rights and equality in Iran, challenging traditional norms."
Zhila Mohaddeshari'atpanahi MENTIONED
Quran researcher and women's rights activist
"She provides a religious and cultural perspective on women's issues, defending traditional practices like dowries."

📰 What Happened

A debate took place on the role of dowries in Iran, with differing views on whether they empower or commodify women.

  • Dowries are seen by some as a financial safety net for women in a male-dominated society.
  • Critics argue dowries perpetuate class inequality and commodification of women.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The debate highlights the tension between traditional practices and modern calls for gender equality.
🌍 Regional: Reflects broader regional struggles with balancing tradition and modernity in women's rights.
🌐 International: Offers insight into the complexities of women's rights in a key Middle Eastern nation, influencing international human rights discussions.

📚 Background

In Iran, dowries are a traditional part of marriage, often seen as financial security for women, but they are also criticized for reinforcing gender and class inequalities.

Women's rights in Iran Gender equality in the Middle East
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source presents multiple perspectives, offering a balanced view of the debate.

The phrase "who has given and who has received the dowry" is a well-known saying. Nevertheless, prisons in Iran are filled with those convicted over dowries. Proponents of dowries view it as a gift from the man to the woman at marriage, arguing that considering all the inequalities women face in Iranian laws, a dowry can serve as a leverage or a reserve for emergencies. Critics, however, ask why women do not seek equal rights instead of demanding dowries. They see dowries as a form of buying and selling women and argue that women should pursue economic independence and equal rights between men and women instead of being entangled in dowries. In this program of Taboo, Mahboubeh Abbasgholizadeh, a women's rights activist, and Zhila Mohaddeshari'atpanahi, a Quran researcher and women's rights activist, discuss this topic. Abbasgholizadeh states that dowries have become a tool to evaluate a woman's family background, education, and beauty, creating a class-based evaluation system. She believes dowries set an unhealthy foundation for equal families and should be reconsidered. Mohaddeshari'atpanahi defends dowries as romantic gifts, likening them to engagement rings in the West, and argues that they should not be conflated with divorce issues. The discussion highlights the contrasting views on dowries and their implications for women's rights and societal norms in Iran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →