Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

In Response to Voice of America, the United States Rejects the Islamic Republic's Claims Against Elaheh Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi

Apr 8, 2026 April 8, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The U.S. State Department has rejected accusations from the Islamic Republic against imprisoned journalists Elaheh Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi, who are facing trial for revealing details about Mahsa Amini's death. This situation highlights ongoing human rights violations in Iran, particularly against journalists and dissenters.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The U.S. firmly rejects Iran's accusations against journalists, emphasizing civil rights violations.

👥 Key Players

Matthew Miller QUOTED
U.S. State Department spokesperson
"'I must point out that during the protests, Iranian officials repeatedly violated the civil rights of Iranians.'"
Niloufar Hamedi TARGET
Journalist
"'Niloufar Hamedi, a journalist for Shargh newspaper, announced the news of Mahsa Amini's death.'"
Elaheh Mohammadi TARGET
Journalist
"'Elaheh Mohammadi, who worked for the Ham-Mihan newspaper, reported on Mahsa Amini's funeral.'"
Narges Mohammadi BENEFICIARY
Journalist
"'Niloufar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi, along with Narges Mohammadi, were recently announced as this year's winners of the UNESCO International Press Freedom Prize.'"
Mohammad Hossein Ajorlou QUOTED
Husband of Niloufar Hamedi
"'Mohammad Hossein Ajorlou, Niloufar Hamedi's husband, reported the transfer of the two from Qarchak prison to the women's section of Evin prison.'"

⚡ Actions

U.S. State Department REJECT Islamic Republic of Iran
"'In relation to this specific question, we reject these accusations. They are clearly not true.'"
Confidence: 90%
Judiciary of the Islamic Republic SCHEDULE Niloufar Hamedi, Elaheh Mohammadi
"'the judiciary of the Islamic Republic has scheduled their trial for next week.'"
Confidence: 90%
Iranian officials VIOLATE civil rights of Iranians
"'Iranian officials repeatedly violated the civil rights of Iranians and punished them for what are fundamental individual freedoms.'"
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

U.S. rejects Iran's accusations against imprisoned journalists Hamedi and Mohammadi.

  • U.S. State Department reject Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Judiciary of the Islamic Republic schedule Niloufar Hamedi, Elaheh Mohammadi
  • Iranian officials violate civil rights of Iranians

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the Iranian government's repression of journalists and civil rights.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects broader issues of human rights and governance in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about U.S.-Iran relations and human rights advocacy.

📚 Background

The U.S. firmly rejects Iran's accusations against journalists, emphasizing civil rights violations.

📝 Key Evidence

"'In relation to this specific question, we reject these accusations. They are clearly not true.'"
→ U.S. rejection of Iran's claims against journalists.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 80%
VOA Persian is generally considered a reliable source for news on Iran.

The spokesperson for the U.S. State Department rejected the Islamic Republic's accusations against Niloufar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi of 'collaborating with America.' Matthew Miller, in response to a question from a Voice of America reporter regarding the case of these two imprisoned journalists, stated: 'In relation to this specific question, we reject these accusations. They are clearly not true.' After months of detention of Elaheh Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi due to revealing the circumstances surrounding the death of Mahsa Amini, the judiciary of the Islamic Republic has scheduled their trial for next week. One of the charges against these two imprisoned journalists is 'collaboration with America.' Mr. Miller also added: 'I must point out that during the protests, Iranian officials repeatedly violated the civil rights of Iranians and punished them for what are fundamental individual freedoms. This includes not only members of the Iranian community who took to the streets to protest but also journalists in the country (Iran).' Niloufar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi, along with Narges Mohammadi, were recently announced as this year's winners of the UNESCO International Press Freedom Prize known as 'Guillermo Cano' on May 2. Niloufar Hamedi, a journalist for Shargh newspaper, announced the news of Mahsa Amini's death after she was killed in custody by the morality police and was arrested a few days later by the security agencies of the Islamic Republic. Elaheh Mohammadi, who worked for the Ham-Mihan newspaper, reported on Mahsa Amini's funeral and has also been in prison since September. A few weeks ago, Mohammad Hossein Ajorlou, Niloufar Hamedi's husband, reported the transfer of the two from Qarchak prison to the women's section of Evin prison. These two journalists have also jointly received the International 'Press Freedom' award from the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression and the 'Lion' award from the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. Niloufar Hamedi and Elaheh Mohammadi were also included in Time magazine's list of the 100 most influential people in 2023. The U.S. State Department spokesperson added that 'sham trials and executions' are among the main efforts of the Iranian regime to suppress any form of dissent. He emphasized: 'We once again, as we have in other cases, call on Iranian officials to stop arbitrary detentions and sham trials and to cease depriving the people of Iran of the fundamental freedoms they deserve.' Matthew Miller, when asked about the recent increase in executions in Iran, said: 'I must say that we are concerned about how the Iranian regime uses executions following what we consider to be sham trials.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →