Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Iran has not withdrawn from 2026 Venice Biennale, pavilion commissioner says

May 14, 2026 May 14, 2026 4 min read 📰 The Art Newspaper
📋 Key Takeaway

Iran's culture ministry denies withdrawing from the 2026 Venice Biennale, stating it is still determined to participate despite the Biennale's announcement of its absence. The country's pavilion commissioner cited the US-Israel war, political, and economic issues, including a sharp currency devaluation, as major challenges preventing a final agreement for full participation. Iran had proposed a shorter participation period, which was rejected.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Iran is actively seeking to maintain its presence in a key international cultural event despite challenges.

👥 Key Players

Aydin Mahdizadeh Tehrani (ایدین مهدی‌زاده تهرانی) QUOTED
director-general of visual arts at Iran’s ministry of culture and Islamic guidance
"“In initial discussions there was no opposition to this, and they [the Biennale] did not say that granting time was impossible.”"
Islamic Republic of Iran (جمهوری اسلامی ایران) ACTOR
government
"“we still insist that the Iranian pavilion be opened.”"
Venice Biennale TARGET
art exhibition
"“the Islamic Republic of Iran will not participate”"

⚡ Actions

Iran's ministry of culture and Islamic guidance NEGOTIATE Venice Biennale organizers
"“We neither submitted a withdrawal letter nor stated that we would not attend. Rather, we said we would participate and requested more time.”"
Confidence: 90%
Venice Biennale ANNOUNCE Islamic Republic of Iran
"“the Islamic Republic of Iran will not participate”"
Confidence: 90%
Iran's ministry of culture and Islamic guidance REQUEST Venice Biennale organizers
"“we still insist that the Iranian pavilion be opened.”"
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iran insists on participation in the 2026 Venice Biennale despite conflicting statements from organizers.

  • Iran's ministry of culture and Islamic guidance negotiate Venice Biennale organizers
  • Venice Biennale announce Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Iran's ministry of culture and Islamic guidance request Venice Biennale organizers

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because participation in the Biennale is seen as a cultural assertion.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects Iran's ongoing cultural diplomacy amidst geopolitical tensions.
🌐 International: Because it highlights the complexities of Iran's international engagements.

📚 Background

Iran is actively seeking to maintain its presence in a key international cultural event despite challenges.

📝 Key Evidence

"“the Islamic Republic of Iran will not participate”"
→ Indicates conflicting statements regarding Iran's participation.
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 90%
The source is a reputable art news outlet.

newsIran has not withdrawn from 2026 Venice Biennale, pavilion commissioner saysMahdizadeh Tehrani, from Iran’s ministry of culture and Islamic guidance (MCIG), has said that the country is still negotiating to show at the event despite Biennale organisers announcing it would not participateSarvy Geranpayeh13 May 2026ShareThe Venice Biennale put out a statement on 4 May in which it said that that “the Islamic Republic of Iran will not participate” in the event

A representative of Iran’s culture ministry has denied the country has withdrawn from the 2026 Venice Biennale, which opened on 9 May, and says it is still determined to take part, even if not for the full duration.

Last week, the Biennale published a brief statement saying that “with regard to the National Participations in the 61st International Art Exhibition, In Minor Keys by Koyo Kouoh (9 May-22 November), it has been announced that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not participate,” without providing a reason. Further attempts by The Art Newspaper to obtain clarification were met with the same response.

“We neither submitted a withdrawal letter nor stated that we would not attend. Rather, we said we would participate and requested more time,” said Aydin Mahdizadeh Tehrani, the director-general of visual arts at Iran’s ministry of culture and Islamic guidance (MCIG) and the country’s pavilion commissioner, in comments to the Iran Students News Agency (ISNA) on Tuesday (12 May).

“In initial discussions there was no opposition to this, and they [the Biennale] did not say that granting time was impossible. In fact, they cooperated well—more than expected.”

Mahdizadeh Tehrani said the Biennale’s decision to announce Iran’s absence days before the opening likely reflects its internal procedures. He added that organisers had required confirmation by the end of March, when the US-Israel war with Iran was ongoing and the situation remained highly uncertain. He said the war played a major role in preventing a final agreement on participation in the Biennale, but that even beforehand a series of “major challenges”, including political and economic issues, had affected planning. He also cited a sharp change in currency values that pushed projected costs to three times the allocated budget, making full participation over the Biennale’s seven-month duration unfeasible. Iran proposed a shorter participation period of “two or three months”, which was rejected by organisers, he said.

In the ISNA interview, Mahdizadeh Tehrani said that MCIG sent a letter to the organisers on 10 May stating “that despite the opening having taken place and even if participation in the competition [Golden Lion awards] is no longer possible, we still insist that the Iranian pavilion be opened.”

He added that intervention from Iran’s foreign ministry, which “explicitly stressed how important Iran’s participation in Venice is”, has renewed efforts to secure a presence at this year’s event.

“We are currently awaiting the final response [from the Biennale], and I expect we will receive a definitive answer within the next couple of days,” Mahdizadeh Tehrani says. “Our intention and plan are to ensure that we are present in Venice over the summer.”

The Art Newspaper has contacted the Venice Biennale and MCIG for comment.

The proposed project by Iran would be a collective, technology-driven presentation incorporating “diverse viewpoints”, Mahdizadeh Tehrani said. “At present, we are mainly waiting for the final timeline to be confirmed. Our expectation is to have around two months,” he added.

He added that the situation has underscored the need for a long-term strategy for Iran’s presence at the Biennale, including proposals for a permanent secretariat and governing structure to support sustained participation. “Our aim is for participation in Venice not to remain an occasional project, but to become part of the office’s established functions and services, with its own defined and independent budget.”

Iran made its debut at the Biennale in 1956, under the Pahlavi regime (1925-1975), but its attendance until the 1979 Islamic Revolution was sporadic. After decades of absence, Iran returned in 2003, with participation remaining intermittent until 2015, when it became more consistent.

news8 May 2026Venice Biennale strike sees more than 15 pavilions temporarily or partially closeThe action, organised by the campaign group Art Not Genocide Alliance, will culminate in a rally in the city

news5 May 2026Iran will not participate at the 2026 Venice Biennale Iran appears to have withdrawn from the 61st edition of the event, amid rising tensions and fears of renewed conflict in the Middle East

news17 March 2026Nearly 200 Venice Biennale participants sign letter demanding cancellation of Israeli pavilionSignatories include artists Alfredo Jaar, Yto Barrada, Rosana Paulino, Meriem Bennani and Cauleen Smith, along with curators such as Binna Choi and Carles Guerra

news6 May 2026Cultural workers at Venice Biennale to strike over Israel’s participation A rally is also planned to take place in the city on the same day, 8 May

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 100%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →