Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Iran Rejects France's Proposal for Negotiations on Its Missile Activities

Jul 13, 2026 July 13, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Iran has rejected France's proposal for negotiations on its missile activities and nuclear deal commitments, citing a lack of trust following the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA. This rejection highlights ongoing tensions between Iran and Western nations, particularly regarding Iran's military capabilities and regional influence.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Iran's firm stance against negotiations signals a potential increase in regional instability.

👥 Key Players

Bahram Qasemi QUOTED
Spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry
"Bahram Qasemi stated that there is 'no reason, necessity, credibility, or trust left for negotiations.'"
Jean-Yves Le Drian QUOTED
French Foreign Minister
"Jean-Yves Le Drian stated that Iran cannot avoid negotiations."
Donald Trump QUOTED
Former U.S. President
"Trump explained the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA, stating it did not contribute to world peace."
Islamic Republic of Iran (جمهوری اسلامی ایران) ACTOR
Government of Iran
"Iran's regional policy is 'in line with peace and security.'"
Reuters QUOTED
News Agency
"Reuters reported that Iran has transferred dozens of ballistic missiles to Iraq."

⚡ Actions

Iranian Foreign Ministry NEGOTIATE France, nuclear deal, missile activities
"Bahram Qasemi stated there is 'no reason, necessity, credibility, or trust left for negotiations.'"
Confidence: 90%
Iran REJECT France's proposal
"Bahram Qasemi rejected negotiations on all three topics."
Confidence: 90%
Bahram Qasemi ACCUSE European officials
"He accused European officials of being unable to take significant action to preserve an international agreement."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Iran rejected France's proposal for negotiations on missile activities and nuclear deal.

  • Iranian Foreign Ministry negotiate France, nuclear deal, missile activities
  • Iran reject France's proposal
  • Bahram Qasemi accuse European officials

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because Iran's rejection of negotiations reflects its stance on sovereignty and military capabilities.
🌍 Regional: Because it may escalate tensions in the Middle East regarding missile proliferation.
🌐 International: Because it complicates diplomatic efforts to address Iran's nuclear and missile programs.

📚 Background

Iran's firm stance against negotiations signals a potential increase in regional instability.

📝 Key Evidence

"Bahram Qasemi stated that there is 'no reason, necessity, credibility, or trust left for negotiations.'"
→ This proves Iran's rejection of negotiations.
"Iran has transferred dozens of ballistic missiles and related launchers to Iraq."
→ This indicates Iran's military expansion and regional influence.
📡 Source: INDEPENDENT
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

One day after the French Foreign Minister called on Iran to agree to negotiations regarding the future of the nuclear deal as well as its missile and regional activities, the Iranian Foreign Ministry rejected negotiations on these matters. According to the official news agency of the Islamic Republic, IRNA, Bahram Qasemi, the spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, stated on Friday, September 9, that under the current circumstances, 'there is no reason, necessity, credibility, or trust left for negotiations, especially on non-negotiable topics.' Bahram Qasemi accused European officials of being unable to take significant action to preserve an international agreement, referring to the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA. Jean-Yves Le Drian, the French Foreign Minister, stated on Thursday that Iran cannot avoid negotiations and must discuss three topics: nuclear commitments after 2025, its missile activities, and its role in establishing stability in the Middle East. In response, Bahram Qasemi rejected negotiations on all three topics, asserting that the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA led to a loss of trust for the Islamic Republic, claiming that Iran's regional policy is 'in line with peace and security,' and that the Islamic Republic's missile program is 'absolutely non-negotiable.' Iran's rejection of negotiations regarding its ballistic missile program and the JCPOA comes as Reuters reported that Iran has transferred dozens of ballistic missiles and related launchers to Iraq and intends to 'turn Iraq into its missile base.' Iran has yet to respond to this report. U.S. President Donald Trump explained the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA earlier this year, stating that the nuclear agreement did not contribute to world peace and that the Islamic Republic continued to develop ballistic missiles and engage in destabilizing activities in the region, violating the spirit of the JCPOA. The three European countries that signed the JCPOA, France, the UK, and Germany, have also stated that while they remain committed to the JCPOA, they share 'common concerns with the U.S. regarding Iran's missile activities and its actions in the region.' Iran's rejection of France's proposal for new negotiations marks the second conflict between the two countries in the past week. Reuters had previously reported on a document in which the French Foreign Ministry requested its diplomats and officials to avoid 'unnecessary travel' to Iran. The document stated that following the thwarting of a bombing plan at a rally of the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization in Paris and Iran's possible involvement in that plan, relations between the two countries have cooled, prompting 'Islamic Republic officials to express harsh positions against Paris.' Iran has previously denied any connection to the bombing plot in Paris and has also denied Reuters' report regarding travel restrictions for French officials to Tehran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →