Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Iran's Foreign Ministry: The Real Fathers of ISIS Exploit the Munich Incident

Jan 29, 2026 January 29, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the media exploitation of the Munich shooter's Iranian-German identity, labeling it psychological warfare by certain countries. The ministry emphasized that the shooter had no ties to ISIS or international terrorism, while also criticizing the portrayal of the Iranian community. This incident highlights ongoing tensions and the narrative battles surrounding terrorism and identity.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Munich shooting has sparked a media war over identity, with Iran defending its community against accusations of terrorism.

👥 Key Players

Bahram Qasemi MENTIONED
Spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry
"He represents the Iranian government's stance on international incidents and media narratives, particularly regarding terrorism and national identity."
Ali Sanbali MENTIONED
Munich shooter
"His identity and background have sparked a media narrative that Iran is seeking to counter, impacting perceptions of Iranian communities abroad."
German Interior Minister MENTIONED
Official responsible for national security
"His statements provide authoritative information on the shooter's background and the nature of the incident, influencing public and media reactions."

📰 What Happened

A shooting incident in Munich resulted in the death of 10 people, with the shooter identified as having Iranian-German heritage. Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the media's portrayal of the shooter as Iranian, labeling it psychological warfare by certain regional countries.

  • The shooter, Ali Sanbali, was not known to German security services and had no ties to international terrorism.
  • The incident has led to a surge in anti-Iranian sentiment on social media, particularly from users in Gulf Arab countries.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The incident and its media portrayal threaten to tarnish the image of the Iranian community abroad and fuel anti-Iranian sentiment.
🌍 Regional: It underscores the ongoing proxy conflicts in the Middle East, particularly between Iran and Saudi Arabia, over narratives of terrorism.
🌐 International: The incident may influence Western perceptions of Iranian immigrants and complicate diplomatic relations with Germany and other European nations.

📚 Background

Iran has long faced accusations of supporting terrorism, often from rival nations like Saudi Arabia. The portrayal of individuals with Iranian heritage in violent incidents can exacerbate existing tensions.

Iran-Saudi Arabia relations Terrorism and identity politics
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reflects the Iranian government's perspective, which may downplay negative associations with Iranian identity and emphasize external blame.

The spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry described the 'exploitation' by media from certain regional countries of the Iranian-German identity of the Munich shooter as 'psychological warfare.' According to the state news agency IRNA, Bahram Qasemi emphasized on Saturday night, July 24, that 'the real fathers of Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Taliban want to rely on such baseless accusations and statements to diminish their dark record.' He also criticized the media, 'especially regional media,' for focusing on the 'alleged' Iranian identity of the shooter and not addressing the essence of the incident. Mr. Qasemi stated, 'This is a psychological war being waged by the media of certain specific countries, which we call the real fathers of Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Taliban, and they want to rely on such accusations and baseless statements to diminish their dark record.' He added, 'Of course, no one will believe these accusations, and the status of the Iranian community worldwide is completely clear and evident, and Iranians are among the best segments in foreign societies.' Iranian officials name Saudi Arabia as the 'main supporter' of terrorism in the region, including support for the Islamic State (ISIS). The spokesperson of Iran's Foreign Ministry also responded to the announcement of the Iranian-German identity of the Munich shooter, stating that this individual was 'German and born in Munich,' and some media had reported on the shooter's mixed heritage and psychological issues, of which they still do not have accurate information. The German Interior Minister announced that Ali Sanbali, the shooter who killed 9 people and injured 27 in Munich on Friday, was not known to the country's security services and there was no connection between him and international terrorism. Meanwhile, German police officials stated that he had been undergoing psychological treatment. However, according to reports, hours after the reports about the Iranian-German identity of this individual were published, many Twitter users from Gulf Arab countries posted anti-Iranian content. Meanwhile, the state newspaper Iran reported that these users were mostly from Saudi Arabia and were posting with hashtags like 'the perpetrator of the Munich attack is Iranian' and 'Iran has distorted the face of Islam.' The spokesperson of Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the Munich incident and expressed condolences to the German people and government. In this context, the shooting at a shopping center in Munich, Germany, left at least 10 people dead. The Iranian-descended shooter in Munich 'has no connection to ISIS or the refugee issue.' Seven of the victims in the Munich shooting were teenagers and of foreign descent. The media response to the announcement of Ali Sanbali's identity highlights the changing dynamics of proxy wars and the conflict against the people in the streets of Iran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →