Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Israeli Foreign Minister: UN General Assembly Resolution was 'Hateful'

Feb 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen condemned a UN resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, labeling it 'hateful' and asserting Israel's intent to destroy Hamas. The resolution passed with significant support but did not specifically condemn Hamas or affirm Israel's right to self-defense, highlighting ongoing tensions in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The UN resolution's rejection by Israel underscores the deep divisions in international responses to the ongoing conflict.

👥 Key Players

Eli Cohen MENTIONED
Israeli Foreign Minister
"Cohen's statements reflect Israel's official stance on the conflict and its international relations, particularly with organizations like the UN."
Gilad Erdan MENTIONED
Israeli Ambassador to the UN
"Erdan's comments highlight Israel's perception of international support and its diplomatic challenges at the UN."
US Ambassador to the UN MENTIONED
Representative of the United States at the UN
"The US's position on Israel's right to self-defense influences international responses and policies regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

📰 What Happened

The UN General Assembly passed a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, which was rejected by Israeli officials as 'hateful.' The resolution did not condemn Hamas or affirm Israel's right to self-defense, leading to strong reactions from Israeli leaders.

  • The resolution passed with 120 votes in favor, 14 against, and 45 abstentions.
  • It called for a ceasefire and condemned violence against civilians but did not specifically address Hamas's actions.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran, as a supporter of Hamas, may view the resolution as a failure of international support for its allies, affecting its regional influence.
🌍 Regional: The resolution and Israel's rejection may escalate tensions in the region, impacting neighboring countries and their responses to the conflict.
🌐 International: The differing views on the resolution highlight the polarized international stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, affecting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has a long history, with recent escalations following Hamas's attacks on Israel and Israel's military responses in Gaza.

Israeli-Palestinian conflict International responses to terrorism
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents a summary of events and reactions from multiple stakeholders, providing a balanced view of the situation.

Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen rejected the UN General Assembly resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, labeling it 'hateful.' He stated on the messaging platform X, 'We explicitly reject the UN General Assembly's hateful call for a ceasefire' and emphasized that 'Israel intends to destroy Hamas just as the world dealt with the Nazis and ISIS.' The UN General Assembly approved a non-binding resolution on Friday, calling for an immediate and lasting ceasefire in Israel and the Gaza Strip. The resolution was passed with 120 votes in favor, 14 against, and 45 abstentions. The resolution called on Israel to revoke its order for the evacuation of Palestinians from northern Gaza and to allow the entry of all necessities, including fuel, into the Gaza Strip. It also urged all parties involved to exercise restraint and avoid provocative and destructive actions. The resolution deemed a 'just and sustainable' solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to be achievable only through peaceful means and condemned 'all violent acts against Palestinian and Israeli civilians, including all terrorist acts and indiscriminate attacks, as well as all provocative and destructive actions from any side.' However, the resolution did not specifically condemn Hamas for its October 7 attack on Israel, nor did it mention the name of this Iran-backed militant group or the killing of Israeli civilians in this attack. The resolution also did not affirm Israel's right to self-defense. Gilad Erdan, Israel's ambassador to the UN, stated in a speech after the resolution's approval, 'Today will be a day of infamy. We have all witnessed that the UN no longer has even a shred of legitimacy and importance.' He added, 'The majority of the international community has shown that it prefers to support the defense of Nazi terrorists rather than the lawful government of Israel, which acts to defend its civilians.' The US ambassador to the UN stated that Israel has the right to defend itself but must also protect Palestinian civilians. The Israeli army intends to eliminate Hamas and take control of Gaza from Hamas; reports by Arash Sigarchi reflect some people's views in Israel regarding the army's ground attack on the Gaza Strip. The draft resolution for the Israel-Hamas war was confirmed at the UN; reports by Gita Aryan indicate widespread communication disruptions in Gaza following increased bombings, coinciding with the expansion of the Israeli army's ground operations.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →