Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Issuance of Indictments for 43 Protesters from December 2017 in Kermanshah

Jun 2, 2026 June 2, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Kermanshah public prosecutor announced indictments for 43 individuals involved in the December 2017 protests, which were initially sparked by economic grievances but escalated into broader political dissent. The protests resulted in significant casualties and arrests, highlighting the ongoing tensions in Iranian society regarding governance and economic conditions.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The indictment of protesters illustrates the Iranian government's crackdown on dissent and the influence of social media.

👥 Key Players

Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi (محمد حسین صادقی) QUOTED
Kermanshah Province public prosecutor
"'the final decision and indictment for 43 individuals involved in the street riots of last December have been issued'"
Saeed Peyvandi QUOTED
sociology professor
"'the specific situation in Iran has led us to deal with a media war in various forms'"
Amin Sabati QUOTED
cybersecurity researcher
"'the rapid flow of information through this platform made Telegram play an important role'"

⚡ Actions

Kermanshah Province public prosecutor INDICT 43 protesters
"'the final decision and indictment for 43 individuals involved in the street riots of last December have been issued'"
Confidence: 90%
Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi ANNOUNCE public
"'the protests began in the context of unmet economic demands of the people'"
Confidence: 90%
Iranian authorities FILTER Telegram and Instagram
"'social media platforms Telegram and Instagram were also filtered in Iran'"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Kermanshah prosecutor indicted 43 protesters from December 2017 protests influenced by social media.

  • Kermanshah Province public prosecutor indict 43 protesters
  • Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi announce public
  • Iranian authorities filter Telegram and Instagram

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it reflects ongoing tensions between the government and citizens over economic issues.
🌍 Regional: Because it shows the impact of social media on political dissent in the region.
🌐 International: Because it highlights human rights issues and the Iranian government's response to dissent.

📚 Background

The indictment of protesters illustrates the Iranian government's crackdown on dissent and the influence of social media.

📝 Key Evidence

"'the protests began in the context of unmet economic demands of the people'"
→ This proves the underlying causes of the protests.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

The public prosecutor of Kermanshah Province announced the issuance of indictments for 43 protesters from the December 2017 protests in the province, stating that they had taken to the streets under the 'influence' of social media. Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi mentioned this in an interview with the official news agency of the judiciary, Mizan Online, on Wednesday (April 8). He referred to the street protests of last December in dozens of cities in Iran as 'bitter events' that left 'damages for society.' According to this judicial official, the protests began 'in the context of unmet economic demands of the people,' but 'quickly led to subversive behaviors.' During the December protests in various cities across Iran, at least 25 people were killed, and thousands were arrested. Some detainees also lost their lives while in prison. The initial protests against the economic situation began on December 28 in Mashhad and several other cities, quickly spreading to dozens of cities across Iran and taking on a political nature. During the protests, there were harsh slogans against the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, both reformist and principlist political factions, support for the Pahlavi kings, and opposition to Iran's presence in regional countries. Sadeghi stated that 'the final decision and indictment for 43 individuals involved in the street riots of last December have been issued, and the case has been sent to court for consideration.' He also claimed that 'the susceptibility of these individuals, due to their age, was significantly influenced by social media, and their notable characteristic was emotional and impulsive behavior instead of logical action.' Concurrently with the expansion of these protests, social media platforms Telegram and Instagram were also filtered in Iran. Although these two popular social media platforms in Iran were unblocked after a while, since late last year, judicial authorities and the Supreme Council of Cyberspace have emphasized the necessity of replacing Telegram with domestic messaging apps. Saeed Peyvandi, a sociology professor in Paris, described the past year as a significant loss for the government in the media war, stating that 'the specific situation in Iran has led us to deal with a media war in various forms, and what has disrupted the rules of the game in recent years is the expansion of the use of new information and communication technologies and the formation of virtual networks that connect people and eliminate the government's comprehensive oversight over society.' According to Amin Sabati, a cybersecurity researcher in London, 'Although Telegram did not play a role in starting the protests, the rapid flow of information through this platform made Telegram play an important role in the circulation of information among Iranians.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 90%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →