Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Jordan Will Not Extend Israel's Use of Its Lands

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

King Abdullah of Jordan announced that he will not extend the lease agreement with Israel for the Baquora and Ghamar areas, asserting their importance as part of Jordanian territory. This decision comes amid public pressure in Jordan and reflects ongoing tensions between Jordan and Israel, particularly regarding the treatment of Palestinians. The situation is significant as it highlights Jordan's national interests and the complexities of regional relations.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Jordan's refusal to extend the lease with Israel underscores rising nationalism and public sentiment against perceived concessions to Israel.

👥 Key Players

King Abdullah II of Jordan MENTIONED
King of Jordan
"He represents Jordan's national interests and public sentiment, particularly regarding relations with Israel and the Palestinian issue."
Benjamin Netanyahu MENTIONED
Prime Minister of Israel
"He is a key figure in Israeli politics and plays a significant role in shaping Israel's foreign relations, especially with neighboring countries like Jordan."

📰 What Happened

King Abdullah of Jordan announced that he will not extend the lease agreement with Israel for the Baquora and Ghamar areas, asserting their importance as part of Jordanian territory. This decision reflects ongoing tensions between the two nations and public pressure in Jordan.

  • The lease agreement was part of the 1994 peace treaty between Jordan and Israel.
  • The areas in question have been leased to Israeli farmers for agricultural use since the treaty was signed.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This development could be seen as a shift in regional alliances, potentially impacting Iran's influence in the Middle East, especially regarding its support for Palestinian groups.
🌍 Regional: It highlights the fragility of peace agreements in the region and may embolden other Arab nations to reconsider their relations with Israel.
🌐 International: This situation could affect international diplomatic efforts aimed at resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and may influence U.S. foreign policy in the region.

📚 Background

Jordan signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1994, making it one of only two Arab countries to do so. The treaty included provisions for Israeli agricultural use of certain Jordanian lands.

Israeli-Palestinian conflict Jordan-Israel relations
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article presents factual information and statements from both Jordanian and Israeli officials, allowing for a balanced understanding of the situation.

Despite Israel's expressed interest, King Abdullah of Jordan announced that he will not extend the 25-year agreement that allowed Israel to lease two border areas of Jordan. On Sunday, October 22, Abdullah stated in a meeting with senior officials, "These areas are part of Jordan's territory and will remain part of our land. In the current regional crisis, Jordan wants to defend its national interests." According to the peace treaty signed in 1994 between the two countries, Israeli farmers can lease the agricultural areas of Baquora and Ghamar, located in northwestern Jordan, and gain special access rights to these lands through private ownership. The agreement is set to expire next year, and the Israeli government had indicated its intention to negotiate with Jordanian officials for an extension. King Abdullah, who has faced public pressure in recent years to end this agreement, tweeted on Sunday: "Baquora and Ghamar have always been our top priorities, and we have decided to remove these annexes from the peace treaty and cancel it." In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that his government would certainly negotiate with Jordan on this matter. According to a statement from the Jordanian Foreign Ministry on Sunday, the peace treaty specifies that at the end of the agreement's term, the lease of these two areas will automatically be extended unless one of the parties announces its unwillingness to extend it one year prior to the expiration. Negotiating to end the 'special status' of these areas, which are currently governed by Israeli law, will be very difficult, and Jordan will face legal challenges in reclaiming these areas. Jordan, along with Egypt, is one of the two Arab countries that have signed a peace treaty with Israel and has close security cooperation with it. Economic cooperation between the two countries also expanded last year, with one of the most significant aspects being the import of natural gas from Israel worth billions of dollars. However, the peace treaty with Israel is not popular among the Jordanian public, where support for Palestinians is very strong. Political activists in the country have strongly opposed the extension of this agreement, calling it 'humiliating' and a 'continuation of occupation.' Additionally, issues that have arisen over the Middle East peace process have somewhat cooled relations between the two countries, and the killing of two Jordanian citizens by an Israeli guard at the Israeli embassy in Amman has further heightened tensions. According to an annex to the peace treaty, 405 hectares of agricultural land at the border between the two countries are allocated to Israeli farmers for growing products for export to the United States and Europe. In part of this land, known as Baquora in Jordan and Naharayim in Israel, the 'ownership rights' of Israeli citizens date back to the 1920s when a Russian Jewish engineer received permission from the British government, which then ruled Palestine, to establish a power plant. The 1994 peace treaty confirmed Jordan's ownership of these lands but granted Israelis the right to maintain ownership and access in these areas.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →