Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Jubeir Calls Reuters Report on Bin Salman 'Ridiculous'; Reuters: We Stand by Our Report

Jan 25, 2026 January 25, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir dismissed a Reuters report claiming internal dissent against Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, calling it 'ridiculous.' In response, Reuters reaffirmed its report's accuracy, which suggested potential royal family efforts to remove bin Salman following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. This situation highlights ongoing tensions within the Saudi leadership and the implications for U.S.-Saudi relations.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The dismissal of dissent within the Saudi royal family underscores ongoing tensions and the precarious position of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

👥 Key Players

Adel al-Jubeir MENTIONED
Saudi Foreign Minister
"As a key figure in Saudi diplomacy, Jubeir's statements reflect the official stance of the Saudi government and its commitment to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman."
Mohammed bin Salman MENTIONED
Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia
"He is a central figure in Saudi leadership and is associated with significant reforms and controversies, including the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi."
Jamal Khashoggi MENTIONED
Journalist and critic of the Saudi government
"His murder has had profound implications for Saudi Arabia's international relations and has sparked global outrage."
Reuters MENTIONED
International news agency
"Their reporting can influence public perception and political discourse regarding Saudi leadership and human rights issues."

📰 What Happened

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir dismissed a Reuters report suggesting internal dissent against Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, calling it 'ridiculous.' Reuters stood by its report, which indicated potential royal family efforts to remove bin Salman following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

  • Al-Jubeir claimed that King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are a 'red line' for Saudi Arabia.
  • The CIA has reportedly concluded that Mohammed bin Salman ordered Khashoggi's murder, raising concerns among U.S. lawmakers.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Iran views Saudi Arabia as a rival and any instability in its leadership could affect regional power dynamics, potentially benefiting Iran.
🌍 Regional: The situation highlights tensions within the Saudi royal family and could influence relations with neighboring countries, particularly in the context of U.S. involvement.
🌐 International: The U.S. Congress's calls for sanctions against Saudi leadership could strain U.S.-Saudi relations, impacting broader geopolitical alliances.

📚 Background

Jamal Khashoggi's murder in 2018 has led to significant international backlash against Saudi Arabia, particularly targeting Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who is accused of orchestrating the act.

U.S.-Saudi relations Human rights in Saudi Arabia
📡 Source: INTERNATIONAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
Reuters is a reputable news agency known for its fact-based reporting, making its claims significant in international discourse.

Immediately after Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi Foreign Minister, deemed a recent Reuters report about the Saudi Crown Prince as 'ridiculous' and laughable, the news agency announced that 'we stand by our report.' On Wednesday, the Saudi Foreign Minister also reacted to the possibility of sanctions against the leaders of his country, stating that King Salman and his Crown Prince are considered a red line for Riyadh, and their positions will not be allowed to be undermined. In an interview with Liz Doust, a reporter for the BBC, Adel al-Jubeir stated that the Saudi government had no role in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, claiming it was the act of 'rogue agents' who 'abused' their positions, but they will be punished. Jamal Khashoggi, a columnist for the Washington Post and a critic of the Saudi Crown Prince, went to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2 to register his marriage but never exited the building. In response to a question regarding requests from U.S. Congress members for sanctions against the Crown Prince, the Saudi Foreign Minister said: 'King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are considered our red line, and any harm to their positions or calls for their removal will not be tolerated, as they represent the people of Saudi Arabia.' In this context, Adel al-Jubeir also dismissed reports about efforts by some members of the Saudi royal family to prevent Mohammed bin Salman from ascending to the throne as 'ridiculous.' In an interview with CNBC, he labeled the Reuters report about dissatisfaction among Saudi princes and their desire to remove the Crown Prince as 'fabricated and unacceptable.' Reuters immediately responded, asserting confidence in the accuracy of its report. Recently, Reuters cited three sources close to the Saudi court, reporting that whispers of removing Mohammed bin Salman from the Crown Prince position had begun within the royal family following Khashoggi's murder (after King Salman's death). Adel al-Jubeir rejected these reports, stating that the Saudi monarchy is committed to its leadership. The Washington Post, the newspaper where Jamal Khashoggi wrote, claimed last week that the CIA concluded that Mohammed bin Salman ordered Khashoggi's murder. However, several American lawmakers and many analysts in international media have identified Mohammed bin Salman as the mastermind behind this murder. Recently, Senator Lindsey Graham, a close ally of Donald Trump in Congress, stated on Sunday that Mohammed bin Salman played a destructive role in U.S.-Saudi relations. Mr. Graham told NBC News: 'I hate to say this because I had high hopes for him to implement the necessary reforms in Saudi Arabia. But as far as Lindsey Graham knows, that ship has sunk.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →