Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Judicial Official: Visible Parts of Vehicles Are Not Private

Jan 27, 2026 January 27, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Iranian judicial officials have declared that the visible parts of vehicles do not constitute private space, while only hidden parts like the trunk are considered private. This statement has sparked controversy, especially given conflicting opinions from religious authorities who view vehicles as personal property. The implications of this ruling could affect privacy rights and law enforcement practices in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Iranian judiciary's stance on vehicle privacy highlights tensions between law enforcement practices and personal property rights.

👥 Key Players

Hadi Sadeqi MENTIONED
Cultural Deputy of the Judiciary
"He represents the judiciary's stance on privacy and vehicle inspections, influencing legal interpretations in Iran."
Saeed Montazer Al-Mahdi MENTIONED
Police Spokesperson
"His statements reflect the police's position on vehicle privacy, impacting law enforcement practices."
Ayatollah Shabiri Zanjani MENTIONED
Religious Authority
"His fatwas influence public opinion and legal interpretations regarding personal property and privacy."

📰 What Happened

Iranian judicial officials have declared that only the hidden parts of vehicles, like trunks, are considered private, while visible parts are not. This ruling has sparked controversy due to conflicting views from religious authorities who see vehicles as personal property.

  • Judicial officials assert that visible parts of vehicles are public space.
  • Conflicting fatwas from religious authorities emphasize the importance of personal property rights.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This ruling could undermine privacy rights and empower law enforcement to conduct inspections without consent, raising concerns among citizens.
🌍 Regional: The implications of this ruling could influence how privacy and personal property are viewed in other countries with similar legal frameworks.
🌐 International: International observers may view this as a further erosion of personal freedoms in Iran, impacting diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

In Iran, the intersection of law and religious authority often leads to conflicting interpretations of personal rights, particularly regarding privacy. This issue has gained prominence amid increased scrutiny of personal freedoms.

Privacy rights in Iran Law enforcement practices in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
This source reflects the official stance of the Iranian government, which may not fully represent public opinion or dissenting views.

Despite the opinions of some religious authorities stating that a vehicle is "personal property," the Deputy of the Judiciary has emphasized that the "visible" parts of a vehicle do not constitute private space. According to this official, only the "hidden" parts of the vehicle, such as the trunk, are considered part of individuals' "private space." Hadi Sadeqi, the Cultural Deputy of the Judiciary, stated that the "hidden part" of the vehicle, like the trunk, is regarded as private, while the "visible part" of the vehicle that can be seen without inspection is not private. He added, "When something is in public view, it is no longer private and does not count as private space, similar to the facade of buildings or a window without a curtain or a person showing themselves in front of a window." Sadeqi had previously mentioned that only those parts of the vehicle that are "automatically hidden" are considered "private space." The issue of whether vehicles are private has resurfaced following statements from the police spokesperson and the issuance of fatwas by religious authorities. Saeed Montazer Al-Mahdi, the police spokesperson, stated on Tuesday, July 4, that the inside of vehicles is not considered private space. However, the ISNA news agency published a day later fatwas from some religious authorities who regard vehicles as "personal property." Ayatollah Shabiri Zanjani stated that "any seizure and inspection without the owner's permission is inherently impermissible. However, if a significant interest, such as preventing the transport of weapons, depends on inspection, it is permissible according to the ruling of the Islamic judge." Other religious authorities, such as Makarem Shirazi and Nouri Hamadani, while emphasizing that the inside of vehicles is part of private space, have stated that "actions must be in accordance with the regulations of the Islamic government." The claims by police and judiciary officials that the inside of vehicles is not considered private because it is visible come despite their own regulations prohibiting the use of tinted glass in a way that obscures the driver and passengers. According to the "Law on the Protection of Promoters of Virtue and Preventers of Vice," which was issued in 2015, places that are "visible to the public without inspection, such as common areas of apartments, hotels, hospitals, and vehicles, are not subject to private space." Meanwhile, Mohammad Tarahmi, the legal deputy of the traffic police, emphasized on Friday that "issues such as uncovering the hijab, manner of dress, creating noise pollution, and any actions that cause harm to others are prohibited inside vehicles." According to Tarahmi, inspecting parts of the vehicle, such as the trunk, which are not visible, requires a judicial order. These statements from police officials come amid reports that police patrols and the Basij are inspecting vehicle trunks without judicial orders.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →