Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Judiciary Denies Filming of 'Naked Body Searches' of Prisoners, But Confirms the Practice

Feb 7, 2026 February 7, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian judiciary has denied the filming of naked body searches of prisoners while confirming the practice itself, following reports from activists about such incidents during detention. This controversy highlights ongoing human rights abuses in Iran, particularly against women. The judiciary's response reflects a broader narrative of denial and deflection regarding human rights violations.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Allegations of abusive searches in Iranian detention centers underscore persistent human rights issues.

👥 Key Players

Mizan News Agency MENTIONED
Media outlet affiliated with the Iranian judiciary
"Acts as the official voice of the Iranian judiciary, providing the state's perspective on legal and human rights issues."
Zeynab Zaman MENTIONED
Political and social activist
"One of the activists reporting on human rights abuses, highlighting the treatment of detainees in Iran."
Nasibe Shamsai MENTIONED
Activist against compulsory hijab
"Part of the 'Girls of Revolution Street' campaign, her accounts add credibility to claims of human rights abuses."
Molavi Abdulhamid Ismailzahi MENTIONED
Sunni Friday prayer leader of Zahedan
"A prominent religious leader who has publicly criticized the Iranian government's practices, adding weight to the allegations."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian judiciary confirmed the practice of body searches of prisoners but denied filming them, amidst reports from activists of abusive searches. The judiciary claims these reports are part of a propaganda campaign against Iran.

  • The judiciary confirmed body searches but denied filming them.
  • Activists reported being stripped and photographed during detention.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Highlights ongoing human rights concerns, potentially affecting internal stability and public perception of the judiciary.
🌍 Regional: Could influence regional views on Iran's governance and human rights practices.
🌐 International: May impact Iran's international relations, especially with Western countries concerned about human rights.

📚 Background

Iran has a history of human rights violations, particularly concerning the treatment of political prisoners and activists. These reports add to a pattern of alleged abuses.

Human rights in Iran Women's rights in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
As a state-affiliated outlet, Mizan News Agency presents the official stance of the Iranian judiciary, which may downplay or deny allegations.

Following the accounts of several women political and social activists regarding their 'naked searches' and 'photographing' during detention by Islamic Republic agents, the news agency of the Iranian judiciary reacted with a statement. The 'Mizan' news agency, affiliated with the judiciary, claimed that 'body searches' of suspects and convicts 'before entering prison' are currently conducted using 'modern technological equipment.' Nevertheless, it confirmed that 'in some specific cases where a complete body examination is necessary,' these searches are conducted 'in accordance with legal, religious standards and the privacy of individuals,' and searches of female prisoners are 'only conducted by female officers.' This news agency, which is funded by the public budget, further emphasized that 'no images are recorded or captured during these searches' and labeled the published accounts as 'part of a black propaganda project against Iran.' In the first week of Khordad (May), several female political and social activists reported cases of 'complete nakedness' by Islamic Republic agents during detention or while being transferred to detention centers, and photographing this situation. Zeynab Zaman, one of these individuals, tweeted that during her detention, 'I was completely stripped twice' and that a police officer told her 'to get completely naked,' with the second instance occurring 'in front of the camera in solitary confinement.' Despite this, the official media of the Iranian judiciary stated that 'no images are recorded or captured' during these searches and that body searches are conducted 'while adhering to all protocols.' The Mizan news agency also introduced a security scenario, adding that these accounts are 'a black propaganda project against Iran abroad,' with some individuals inside 'echoing the same words as foreigners.' Meanwhile, Nasibe Shamsai, an activist against compulsory hijab in the 'Girls of Revolution Street' campaign, also confirmed these accounts and tweeted: 'This was done to me three times' and 'it is unclear who was observing. The female guard said to take off all your clothes.' Despite these accounts and similar reports from other individuals in recent years and decades regarding sexual harassment, being stripped in front of a camera in Islamic Republic detention centers and prisons, the judiciary's media has threatened narrators that 'claims made without evidence will be pursued legally.' So far, other women such as Shaparak Shajary, Mojgan Keshavarz, and Mahnaz Afshar have also published similar accounts of such behaviors by Islamic Republic agents in detention centers, prisons, or police facilities. The record of the Islamic Republic in terms of human rights has been documented in various UN reports over the past few decades. Violations of the rights of detainees and prisoners, the use of 'torture,' and the lack of independent investigation into the claims made are part of the Islamic Republic's human rights record in international forums. Molavi Abdulhamid Ismailzahi, the Sunni Friday prayer leader of Zahedan, also stated on May 29 in protest of this situation that 'torture has become a common practice.'

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →