Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Judiciary Describes Open Support for Improved Relations with the U.S. as a Crime

Feb 12, 2026 February 12, 2026 2 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian Judiciary has declared that openly supporting improved relations with the U.S. is a crime, following hardline rhetoric from Supreme Leader Khamenei. Reformist lawmakers, however, are committed to continuing discussions aimed at thawing relations with Washington. This conflict highlights the ongoing struggle between reformist and hardline factions within Iran's political landscape.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The Iranian Judiciary's stance against U.S. relations underscores the ongoing power struggle between reformists and hardliners, impacting Iran's future foreign policy.

👥 Key Players

Seyyed Ali Khamenei MENTIONED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"As the highest authority in Iran, Khamenei's views significantly influence the country's foreign policy and political climate."
Mohammad Khatami MENTIONED
Former President of Iran and reformist leader
"Khatami represents the reformist faction that seeks improved relations with the U.S., advocating for dialogue to reduce tensions."
Mohammad Reza Khatami MENTIONED
Deputy Speaker of Parliament and reformist lawmaker
"As a prominent reformist voice, he challenges hardline positions and supports continued discussions with the U.S."
Iranian Judiciary MENTIONED
Judicial authority in Iran
"The Judiciary's rulings reflect the hardline stance against reformist initiatives and influence public discourse on foreign relations."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian Judiciary has declared that openly supporting improved relations with the U.S. is a crime, following hardline rhetoric from Supreme Leader Khamenei. Despite this, reformist lawmakers are determined to pursue discussions aimed at thawing relations with Washington.

  • The Judiciary's directive is seen as a response to Khamenei's labeling of negotiations with the U.S. as treasonous.
  • Reformist lawmakers argue that the prohibition lacks legal basis and contradicts the Iranian Constitution.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This conflict highlights the deep divisions within Iranian politics, affecting the country's ability to engage with the international community.
🌍 Regional: The outcome of this internal struggle could influence regional dynamics, particularly in relation to U.S. involvement in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Western nations, especially the U.S., are closely monitoring these developments as they could affect diplomatic efforts and sanctions policies.

📚 Background

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has maintained a contentious relationship with the U.S., marked by mutual hostility and sanctions. Reformists advocate for dialogue to improve relations, while hardliners resist any engagement.

Iran-U.S. relations Political factions in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article reflects the official stance of the Iranian government, which may downplay dissenting views and emphasize hardline positions.

The Judiciary has described open support for improving relations with the United States as a crime. Reformists in Iran have vowed to continue their negotiations aimed at improving Tehran-Washington relations despite the Judiciary's directive against openly supporting dialogue with the U.S. Officials from the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Parliament stated yesterday that they will continue their sessions to address the issue of Iran-U.S. relations and other foreign policy matters. This committee, allied with President Mohammad Khatami, announced that this prohibition would have no effect on the decision to engage in parliamentary discussions regarding the establishment of relations with the U.S. The state news agency reported that Mohammad Reza Khatami, the Deputy Speaker of Parliament and brother of the President, stated that the Judiciary's directive has no legal basis and undermines the judiciary. Other reformist lawmakers have described the prohibition as contrary to the Constitution. Earlier this week, the hardline Judiciary labeled open support for improved relations with the U.S. as a crime. This directive followed remarks made last week by Seyyed Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, who called negotiations with the U.S. treasonous and foolish, accusing those who advocate for it of being unpatriotic. Some Iranian newspapers and reformist representatives in Parliament have insisted on dialogue with the U.S. to mitigate hostility and end over two decades of enmity following the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →