Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی ✈️ Telegram EN فا
❓ Unknown

Judiciary Forms Case Against Female Employees of Digikala for Hijab Violations

Feb 6, 2026 February 6, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian Judiciary has opened a case against female employees of Digikala for not adhering to hijab regulations, following social media posts showing their non-compliance. This action reflects ongoing tensions in Iran regarding women's rights and the enforcement of mandatory hijab laws amidst widespread protests. The situation highlights the government's struggle to maintain control over civil disobedience in the wake of recent protests.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Iran's judiciary is cracking down on hijab non-compliance, reflecting broader societal tensions and international human rights concerns.

👥 Key Players

Digikala MENTIONED
E-commerce company in Iran
"As a major online retailer, Digikala is a significant player in Iran's economy and its employees' actions can reflect broader societal trends."
Mousa Ghazanfari Abadi MENTIONED
Head of the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly
"He is a key figure in shaping and enforcing Iran's legal stance on social issues, including the hijab mandate."
Javaid Rahman MENTIONED
UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran
"He provides an international perspective on human rights issues in Iran, including women's rights and the mandatory hijab."

📰 What Happened

The Iranian Judiciary has initiated a legal case against female employees of Digikala for not complying with the mandatory hijab law, following images shared on social media. This is part of a broader crackdown on women's rights and civil disobedience in Iran.

  • The case was formed after social media images showed female employees without hijabs.
  • The action is part of a larger governmental effort to enforce hijab compliance amid ongoing protests.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: This reflects the government's struggle to enforce religious laws amid growing civil disobedience and societal change.
🌍 Regional: It highlights the cultural and political tensions in the Middle East regarding women's rights and religious mandates.
🌐 International: The case draws international attention to Iran's human rights record, potentially affecting its diplomatic relations.

📚 Background

Iran mandates that women wear hijabs in public, a law that has faced increasing opposition, especially after the death of Mahsa Amini in custody.

Mandatory hijab laws Women's rights in Iran
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source is likely to reflect the Iranian government's perspective and may underreport dissenting views.

On Saturday, July 31, the Judiciary News Agency reported the formation of a "judicial case regarding the non-compliance with hijab by female employees of one of the sections of Digikala." According to Mizan, "Following the publication of images on social media attributed to employees of one of the sections of Digikala indicating non-compliance with hijab by female employees in the workplace, a judicial case has been formed in this regard." The report did not provide further details, including the number of women for whom judicial cases have been formed. In the wake of nationwide protests in Iran following the death of Mahsa Amini while in the custody of the morality police, an increasing number of girls and women, including actresses and athletes, have removed their headscarves as a sign of opposition. Additionally, see: Open Iran Database: 86% of women went out without mandatory hijab in 2023. In this context, the Islamic Republic has made significant efforts in recent months to prevent civil disobedience by women through heavy judicial sentences. Nevertheless, Mousa Ghazanfari Abadi, head of the Judicial and Legal Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, stated in an interview with Rouydad 24 that he firmly believes that the phenomenon of "unveiling" will be eradicated in the country for two reasons: cultural work and punishment. However, images and videos published on social media indicate that girls and women continue to oppose the mandatory hijab desired by the Islamic Republic. In this regard, Javaid Rahman, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran, stated last Friday that the return of the morality police aims to "further violate the rights of women through mandatory hijab." He noted that currently, "the worst human rights violations are being implemented in Iran," adding, "Women and girls in Iran face the worst violations of their fundamental rights, which I call gender discrimination." He referred to the death of Mahsa (Jina) Amini in the custody of the morality police as "an example of the deplorable situation of women and girls in Iran," and criticized the mandatory hijab law as "full of violence, brutality, and a violation of dignity and human rights." From the closure of venues to the arrest and sentencing of women; the government's efforts to impose mandatory hijab continue. A silent march in Zahedan; Molavi Abdolhamid did not remain silent about the imposition of mandatory hijab. Narges Mohammadi: Women's defiance will break the authoritarian power of the religious government. Mehdi Ghalian: Sepideh appeared in court without a headscarf and chador. Beating of tourists in the "Opert" resort by agents; eyewitness: They said to hand over the drinks. Head of the Judicial and Legal Commission: We will eradicate the phenomenon of "unveiling" through punishment and cultural discussions.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →