Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Judiciary Spokesman Denies 'Acquittal' of Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi on Charges of Collaborating with an Adversarial Country

Jun 3, 2026 June 3, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

The Iranian judiciary spokesman denied claims of acquittal for journalists Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi, who are charged with collaborating with an adversarial country. Their lawyers assert that there is no evidence against them and that conditions are favorable for their acquittal. This case highlights ongoing issues of press freedom and judicial fairness in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The judiciary's denial of acquittal underscores ongoing repression of dissent in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Masoud Setayesh (مسعود ستایش) QUOTED
Judiciary Spokesman
"'We deny this matter.'"
Elahe Mohammadi (الهه محمدی) ACCUSED
Journalist
"Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi were arrested during last year's nationwide protests."
Niloufar Hamedi (نیلوفر حامدی) ACCUSED
Journalist
"Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi were arrested during last year's nationwide protests."
Parto Borhanpour (پارتو برهان‌پور) QUOTED
Lawyer
"They have requested their release from judicial authorities."
Shahab Mirlohi (شهاب میرحلویی) QUOTED
Lawyer
"Mirlohi also emphasized that the court acquitted Elnaz Mohammadi."
Elnaz Mohammadi (الناز محمدی) QUOTED
Journalist
"the court acquitted Elnaz Mohammadi of the charge of collaborating with an adversarial government."

⚡ Actions

Iranian judiciary INDICT Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
"'We deny this matter.'"
Confidence: 90%
Iranian authorities ARREST Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
"Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi were arrested during last year's nationwide protests."
Confidence: 90%
U.S. Department of State PROTEST Iranian judiciary
"The trial of these two journalists aims to 'intimidate journalists in Iran.'"
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iran judiciary denies acquittal of journalists Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi charged with collaboration.

  • Iranian judiciary indict Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
  • Iranian authorities arrest Elahe Mohammadi, Niloufar Hamedi
  • U.S. Department of State protest Iranian judiciary

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because the case highlights the repression of journalists and freedom of expression.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects broader issues of human rights and governance in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about Iran's treatment of journalists and press freedom.

📚 Background

The judiciary's denial of acquittal underscores ongoing repression of dissent in Iran.

📝 Key Evidence

"We deny this matter."
→ Judiciary's denial of acquittal for the accused journalists.
"The one who must decide is the judge of the court."
→ Judiciary's claim of authority over the case.
"the environment is conducive for their 'acquittal.'"
→ Lawyers' assertion regarding the potential for acquittal.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source is a Persian-language outlet, which may reflect state perspectives.

The spokesman for the judiciary responded to a question regarding the 'acquittal' of Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi from the charge of 'collaboration with an adversarial country,' stating: 'We deny this matter.' Masoud Setayesh emphasized that these two individuals have been charged under this accusation and the court is currently reviewing the case on this basis. In his weekly press conference, he addressed the lawyers' claims that 'there is no evidence or documentation of their collaboration with the U.S. government in the case,' stating: 'The one who must decide is the judge of the court.' On September 19, the lawyers of Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi asserted that the environment is conducive for their 'acquittal,' noting that more than two months have passed since their last defense, and the court has not issued a ruling, nor has the detention order been converted to bail. Elahe Mohammadi and Niloufar Hamedi were arrested during last year's nationwide protests for covering the news of Mahsa Amini's death while in custody of the 'Guidance Patrol' and were accused of 'collaboration with an adversarial government,' an accusation that has always been denied by both women and their lawyers. The U.S. Department of State also rejected the Iranian judiciary's claims regarding 'the connection of Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi with the U.S. government,' emphasizing that the trial of these two journalists, who played a role in reporting Mahsa Amini's death, aims to 'intimidate journalists in Iran.' Parto Borhanpour, lawyer for Niloufar Hamedi, and Shahab Mirlohi, lawyer for Elahe Mohammadi, stated in an interview published on September 19 in the Shargh newspaper that they have requested their release from judicial authorities, as their temporary detention should not exceed one year. Mirlohi also emphasized that the court acquitted Elnaz Mohammadi [sister of Elahe Mohammadi] of the charge of collaborating with an adversarial government, stating that when a 'specialized branch' of the Revolutionary Court does not consider a similar case as criminal, 'this charge no longer applies to our client.' Previously, Amir Raeisiyan, lawyer for Elnaz Mohammadi, reported the issuance of an acquittal for the charge of 'collaboration with an adversarial government' against his client and a three-year suspended sentence for her, as well as for Negin Bagheri, journalists from the 'Ham Mihan' and 'Haft Sobh' newspapers, for the charge of 'conspiracy and collusion to commit a crime against security.' Saeedeh Fathi Abadi, a journalist, previously told Voice of America that the Islamic Republic does not even adhere to its own laws regarding Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi. One year of temporary detention for Niloufar Hamedi and Elahe Mohammadi; lawyers say the environment is 'conducive for acquittal.' Anniversary of Mahsa; report by the International Federation of Journalists on a year of repression of journalists and media in Iran. Anniversary of Mahsa; Reporters Without Borders: During the 'widespread repression' of protests, 79 Iranian journalists were arrested. The fact-finding committee: The increase in the repression of women and governmental 'revenge' in Iran is a serious concern. The International Federation of Journalists condemned the conviction of two journalists in Iran.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →