Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Judiciary Spokesman: We Were Under Pressure in Mehdi Hashemi's Case

Jul 20, 2026 July 20, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, the Iranian judiciary spokesman, revealed that the judiciary faced various pressures in the case of Mehdi Hashemi, who received a 10-year prison sentence. The case has drawn attention due to allegations of political interference and concerns over judicial independence. This situation highlights ongoing tensions within Iran's political and judicial systems.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Judicial independence in Iran is under threat from powerful individuals.

👥 Key Players

Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei (غلامحسین محسنی اژه‌ای) ACTOR
Judiciary Spokesman
"We were really under pressure from various directions."
Mehdi Hashemi (مهدی هاشمی) TARGET
Son of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani
"The issuance of a definitive sentence of 10 years imprisonment for Mehdi Hashemi."
Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani (اکبر هاشمی رفسنجانی) QUOTED
Former President of Iran
"I do not want to interfere in the judiciary's work."
Judge Saraj AFFECTED
Judge
"Judge Saraj's position was changed."
Efat Marashi (افتاب مرشی) QUOTED
Wife of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani
"Described her son's ruling as 'fatherless behavior.'"

⚡ Actions

Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei ANNOUNCE Mehdi Hashemi
"In Mehdi Hashemi's case, we were really under pressure from various directions."
Confidence: 90%
Iranian judiciary APPOINT Judge Saraj
"Judge Saraj's position was changed and he was appointed as the head of the General Inspection Organization."
Confidence: 90%
Iranian judiciary INDICT Mehdi Hashemi
"The issuance of a definitive sentence of 10 years imprisonment for Mehdi Hashemi."
Confidence: 90%

📰 What Happened

Iranian judiciary faces pressure in Mehdi Hashemi's case amid claims of judicial interference.

  • Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei announce Mehdi Hashemi
  • Iranian judiciary appoint Judge Saraj
  • Iranian judiciary indict Mehdi Hashemi

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the pressures faced by the judiciary and potential interference.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects broader issues of judicial independence in the region.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about human rights and the rule of law in Iran.

📚 Background

Judicial independence in Iran is under threat from powerful individuals.

📝 Key Evidence

"In Mehdi Hashemi's case, we were really under pressure from various directions."
→ Judicial pressure and interference.
"If this is the case, then what happens to the independence of the judiciary?"
→ Concerns about judicial independence.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, spokesman and first deputy of the Iranian judiciary, stated on Saturday, July 6, that the judiciary was under pressure from "various directions" in Mehdi Hashemi's case, but the change of the judge in Mr. Hashemi's case was not in this context. According to Iranian news agencies, Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, in an interview with the second channel of the state television, said: "In Mehdi Hashemi's case, we were really under pressure from various directions, but the change of Judge Saraj was not in this context." He added: "Judge Saraj's position was changed and he was appointed as the head of the General Inspection Organization. The inspection was a reporter in this case and later, if deemed necessary, could appeal the ruling." The spokesman of the Iranian judiciary had previously announced the issuance of a definitive sentence of 10 years imprisonment for Mehdi Hashemi, the son of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. Mehdi Hashemi, in August of last year, after the change of his case judge, mentioned this change as "inconsistent with the principles of fair trial." According to ISNA, Mehdi Hashemi, in a text referring to the news of the replacement of his case judge, wrote: "The transfer of the case from Judge Saraj and referral to another judge, after the proceedings had begun by him and a year of judicial work and oversight by the aforementioned over the case, for any excuse, is completely unprecedented and inconsistent with the principles of fair trial." While the first deputy of the judiciary spoke about pressures in Mehdi Hashemi's case on Saturday in this television program, the day before he had stated in his speech at Friday prayers in Tehran that a "powerful individual" is threatening the judiciary. Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei emphasized: "Unfortunately, an individual who is powerful and holds a position tells us that I should determine the judge and I should decide who the judge should be; if this is the case, then what happens to the independence of the judiciary?" Meanwhile, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has not yet reacted to the ruling against his son, but before the issuance of the ruling, he had told the Shargh newspaper: "I do not want to interfere in the judiciary's work. I have always told the leadership and the head of the judiciary and everyone. I do not know the judge and have never seen him. I told them that if Mehdi has committed a crime, my preference is that he sees his punishment in this world and does not fall into the afterlife, because the afterlife is very hard, and if he has not committed a crime, it is not befitting of the Islamic Republic to accuse or convict a person who has not committed a crime due to political issues." Meanwhile, last week, Efat Marashi, the wife of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, described her son's ruling as "fatherless behavior." Mehdi Hashemi was charged at the airport upon his return to Iran on October 24, 2012, and after introducing himself to the prosecutor's office, he was arrested. He was released on bail on December 17, 2012, after nearly three months of imprisonment.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →