Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Khamenei: If the nuclear issue progresses, sanctions will not be lifted

May 3, 2026 May 3, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Ayatollah Khamenei has reiterated that international sanctions against Iran will persist even if a nuclear deal is reached, urging resistance against these sanctions. He accused the U.S. of supporting ISIS while expressing skepticism about ongoing nuclear negotiations. This stance reflects Iran's broader geopolitical tensions and the complexities of international diplomacy.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Khamenei's remarks suggest a persistent adversarial relationship with the U.S. and skepticism about nuclear negotiations.

👥 Key Players

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (آیت‌الله علی خامنه‌ای) QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"Serious work must be done. We can resist against the sanctions and thwart the enemies' goals."
Islamic State group ACCUSED
Terrorist organization
"He also accused the United States of providing military assistance to the Islamic State group."
United States ACCUSED
Country
"Khamenei accused the United States of providing military assistance to the Islamic State group."
Barack Obama MENTIONED
Former President of the United States
"President Barack Obama had addressed common interests in the fight against ISIS."

⚡ Actions

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ANNOUNCE international sanctions against Iran
"I believe that if the nuclear issue progresses as they dictate, the sanctions will still not be lifted."
Confidence: 90%
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ACCUSE United States, Islamic State group
"He also accused the United States of providing military assistance to the Islamic State group."
Confidence: 90%
Iran and the 1+5 group NEGOTIATE nuclear agreement
"Iran and the 1+5 group are in the midst of extensive negotiations."
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Khamenei asserts sanctions will persist despite nuclear negotiations and accuses the U.S. of aiding ISIS.

  • Ayatollah Ali Khamenei announce international sanctions against Iran
  • Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accuse United States, Islamic State group
  • Iran and the 1+5 group negotiate nuclear agreement

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because Khamenei's stance reinforces national resilience against sanctions.
🌍 Regional: Because it highlights Iran's defiance against U.S. influence in the region.
🌐 International: Because it indicates ongoing tensions between Iran and Western powers regarding nuclear issues.

📚 Background

Khamenei's remarks suggest a persistent adversarial relationship with the U.S. and skepticism about nuclear negotiations.

📝 Key Evidence

"The enemy is making the maximum use of the weapon of sanctions."
→ This proves the ongoing conflict and the significance of sanctions in Iran's political discourse.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance towards the Iranian government.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Republic, once again predicted that international sanctions against Iran would remain even if a nuclear agreement is reached, and he called for the country to stand firm against the sanctions. He also accused the United States of providing military assistance to the Islamic State group. According to the official website of Ayatollah Khamenei on Wednesday, February 17, he stated in a gathering with a group of people from Azerbaijan, Iran, regarding international sanctions against Tehran: "Serious work must be done. We can resist against the sanctions and thwart the enemies' goals. If we do not, the enemy will impose conditions on our nuclear program and impose sanctions." He added, "The enemy is making the maximum use of the weapon of sanctions, and its goal is to stop the movement of the people." The leader of the Islamic Republic further stated: "I believe that if the nuclear issue progresses as they dictate, the sanctions will still not be lifted because they oppose the essence of the revolution." Ayatollah Khamenei had made a similar prediction late last year, saying that "even if negotiations yield results, sanctions will remain because the nuclear issue and human rights are merely excuses, and global bullies are afraid of the independence-seeking and exemplary nature of the Iranian nation." Iran and the 1+5 group are in the midst of extensive negotiations that reached a milestone last December with a temporary agreement in Geneva, which led to a reduction of international sanctions against the Islamic Republic and the release of part of Iran's frozen assets in other countries. However, Khamenei has expressed pessimism about the outcome of the negotiations, which are set to continue until July. In another part of his remarks on Wednesday, he referred to the Islamic State group (ISIS) and the international coalition against it, which is led by the United States. Ayatollah Khamenei said: "In the hypocritical coalition formed against ISIS, they wrote a letter to the Iranian Foreign Ministry stating that we do not support ISIS. However, photographs of U.S. military assistance to ISIS were available to revolutionary fighters." In November, the Wall Street Journal reported that President Barack Obama had addressed common interests in the fight against ISIS in a confidential letter to Ayatollah Khamenei, which provoked severe criticism from American Republicans. However, Khamenei later called the international coalition against ISIS a "pure lie" and stated that ISIS, under the guise of Islam, serves the interests of the U.S., Israel, and European countries. The Wall Street Journal, however, reported on February 13 that this time Ayatollah Khamenei wrote a letter to Barack Obama discussing the possibility of cooperation between Tehran and Washington in the fight against ISIS if an agreement is reached on Iran's nuclear issue. This report was denied by the Iranian Foreign Ministry.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →