Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Landlords in Kerman and Dog Ownership Fines

Jan 30, 2026 January 30, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

The Kerman city council has approved a regulation imposing fines on dog owners and prohibiting sheep keeping in urban areas. This decision has sparked backlash from the Iranian Animal Rights Association, which argues it violates constitutional rights and promotes discord among citizens. The regulation raises concerns about local governance and individual freedoms in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The regulation by Kerman city council on dog and sheep ownership is controversial, highlighting governance and civil liberty issues in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Kerman City Council MENTIONED
Local governing body in Kerman
"Responsible for local regulations and urban management in Kerman, reflecting local governance dynamics in Iran."
Iranian Animal Rights Association MENTIONED
Advocacy group for animal rights
"Represents civil society interests in animal welfare and individual freedoms, challenging governmental decisions."
Ali Akbar Moshrefi MENTIONED
Head of the Kerman City Council
"Key decision-maker in the implementation of local regulations affecting residents' lives."
Javid Al-Davood MENTIONED
Director of the Iranian Animal Rights Association in Tehran
"Voices opposition to the regulation, highlighting concerns about civil liberties and governance."

📰 What Happened

The Kerman city council approved a regulation imposing fines on dog ownership and prohibiting sheep within urban limits, sparking opposition from animal rights advocates.

  • Dog owners face fines up to fifty thousand tomans.
  • Keeping sheep in urban areas is prohibited with fines up to one hundred thousand tomans.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Highlights tensions between local authorities and civil society regarding governance and individual freedoms.
🌍 Regional: Reflects broader regional issues of governance and civil liberties in Middle Eastern urban settings.
🌐 International: May draw attention from international human rights organizations concerned with civil liberties in Iran.

📚 Background

Iran has a complex relationship with civil liberties, where local regulations can sometimes conflict with individual freedoms.

Animal rights in Iran Local governance in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The source appears to provide a factual account of events without evident bias, but readers should consider the broader context of Iranian media.

The local newspaper Payam in Kerman has reported the approval of a regulation by the city council, which states that individuals who keep dogs at home will face a fine of up to fifty thousand tomans. This regulation also emphasizes the prohibition of keeping sheep within urban limits, with a fine of up to one hundred thousand tomans for those who violate it. The approval of this regulation by the members of the Kerman city council has faced opposition from the Iranian Animal Rights Association, which in a letter to Ali Akbar Moshrefi, the head of the Kerman city council, described the regulation as strange, unconstitutional, and a restriction on individual freedoms. Javid Al-Davood, the director of the Iranian Animal Rights Association in Tehran, responded to questions from Radio Farda regarding this matter. He mentioned that he spoke on the phone with the head of the city council, who stated that they can establish a series of laws themselves. When asked for examples, the council head suggested that further questions could be posed later, but no answers have been received so far. Legally and constitutionally, the city council is obligated and responsible for urban issues, which must be sent to the governor for approval and then executed by the municipality. Al-Davood pointed out that the council head only mentioned that this law had existed before. When asked why they wanted to reapprove a previously existing law, the council head said they need to renew or change it every year. Al-Davood expressed hope that the request from the association and the small animal veterinary community would lead to the cancellation of this regulation or prevent similar regulations in the future. He noted that many people in urban areas keep sheep, and this announcement seems to be aimed at removing them. He criticized the city council's decision as a means of sowing discord among the people and creating security issues for the country, stating that such a regulation is unjustifiable and strange. He emphasized that if people are keeping sheep in the city, urban expansion should involve purchasing the areas where they are located. He also mentioned that the council does not have the authority to set fines, which should be determined by a judge and court, not the city council. He concluded that the regulation would only create disputes among residents and that the city council lacks the necessary executive powers to enforce such a law, potentially leading to reliance on law enforcement and judicial authorities.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 90%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →