Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
❓ Unknown

Lawyer of the Victims' Families Emphasizes Deficiencies in the Case: I Am Not Optimistic About the Court's Ruling

Feb 5, 2026 February 5, 2026 3 min read 📰 VOA Persian
📋 Key Takeaway

Manoush Manouchehri, the lawyer for the families of the victims of Dariush Mehrjui and Vahideh Mohammadi-Far, criticized the court's handling of the case, citing numerous deficiencies and a lack of access to essential evidence. He expressed skepticism about the court's ruling, urging for a return of the case to the prosecutor's office for further investigation. This case highlights ongoing concerns about judicial processes in Iran.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The skepticism surrounding the judicial process in this high-profile murder case reflects broader concerns about justice in Iran.

👥 Key Players

Manoush Manouchehri MENTIONED
Lawyer for the victims' families
"He represents the families of prominent Iranian filmmaker Dariush Mehrjui and his wife, highlighting issues within the Iranian judicial system."
Dariush Mehrjui MENTIONED
Renowned Iranian director
"His murder has drawn significant public attention and reflects broader concerns about safety and justice in Iran."
Vahideh Mohammadi-Far MENTIONED
Victim and wife of Dariush Mehrjui
"Her death alongside her husband raises questions about the treatment of high-profile individuals in Iran."
Eskandar and Mirowis MENTIONED
Defendants in the murder case
"Their conflicting statements about the intent behind the crime illustrate the complexities of the case."

📰 What Happened

Manoush Manouchehri criticized the court's handling of the murder case of filmmaker Dariush Mehrjui and his wife, citing significant deficiencies and a lack of access to evidence. He expressed skepticism about the court's ruling and called for further investigation.

  • The court session lasted 11 hours and involved two defendants with conflicting statements about their intentions.
  • Manouchehri highlighted that essential evidence has not been provided to the plaintiffs, raising concerns about the judicial process.

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: The case underscores significant issues within Iran's judicial system, including transparency and the treatment of high-profile cases.
🌍 Regional: It may influence public perception of governance and justice in Iran, potentially affecting regional stability.
🌐 International: The handling of this case could draw international scrutiny regarding human rights and judicial integrity in Iran.

📚 Background

Dariush Mehrjui is a significant figure in Iranian cinema, and his murder raises alarms about safety and judicial fairness in Iran. The case has attracted public interest due to the couple's prominence.

Judicial reform in Iran Human rights issues in Iran
📡 Source: NEUTRAL
📊 Confidence: 70%
The article comes from a Tehran-based newspaper, which may reflect local perspectives but aims to report on judicial issues.

Manoush Manouchehri, the lawyer for the victims' families of Dariush Mehrjui and Vahideh Mohammadi-Far, emphasized the existence of "formal and substantive deficiencies" in the case, stating that one cannot be optimistic about the ruling issued by the court. On Wednesday, February 7, he told the Tehran-based newspaper Etemad that despite his numerous requests, "the items that should normally be provided to the plaintiffs and their lawyers during the proceedings" have not been given to him, and the process has "multiple flaws." According to the lawyer for the victims' families of the renowned Iranian director Dariush Mehrjui and his wife Vahideh Mohammadi-Far, he expressed hope that the court would "return this murder case to the prosecutor's office for the purpose of correcting" the deficiencies and "completing the investigations," otherwise, "one cannot be optimistic about the ruling issued." Manouchehri stated that based on the "latest forensic report" and even its "image," it has not yet been "communicated" to the plaintiffs and their lawyers for review. The lawyer also mentioned that "there has been opposition to obtaining copies of the case files, and the complete reconstruction video of the crime scene has not been seen by us so far." The court session regarding the murder case of Dariush Mehrjui, the famous filmmaker, and his wife Vahideh Mohammadi-Far, lasted 11 hours on January 18 in the first branch of the Criminal Court of Alborz Province. The Judiciary of the Islamic Republic has announced that the two defendants in the case do not have identification documents and medical tests have shown that they have not yet reached legal age. According to state media reports, in the final court session, one of the defendants named Eskandar stated that "our goal was not to kill anyone; we only intended to rob Mehrjui's house," while the other defendant named Mirowis claimed that their intention was "murder." Additionally, it is noted that the main defendant in the murder case of Dariush Mehrjui and Vahideh Mohammadi-Far, on Wednesday, January 17, stated in the Alborz Criminal Court session that he did not commit this murder and "confessed under duress." The appeals court confirmed the prison sentences issued against Asadollah Fakhimi and Houri Khanpour. A condemned prisoner died in Tabriz prison following a suicide. Khosrow Alikordi, a lawyer for political prisoners and the families of the victims, was once again summoned to the judiciary. The defendant in the murder of Mehrjui and Mohammadi-Far stated: "I confessed under duress." The appeals court confirmed the prison sentences issued against Asadollah Fakhimi and Houri Khanpour. A condemned prisoner died in Tabriz prison following a suicide. Khosrow Alikordi, a lawyer for political prisoners and the families of the victims, was once again summoned to the judiciary.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →