Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Leader's Representative in the IRGC Describes Document 2030 as Very Dangerous

Jul 15, 2026 July 15, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Ali Saidi, a representative of Iran's Supreme Leader, condemned Document 2030 as dangerous and called for elite intervention. The document, part of a UN initiative for sustainable development, has been criticized by conservatives who claim it promotes homosexuality in schools. This controversy highlights ongoing tensions within Iran's political landscape regarding education and international agreements.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: The debate over Document 2030 reveals significant ideological rifts within Iran.

👥 Key Players

Ali Saidi (علی سعیدی) ACTOR
Representative of the Supreme Leader in the IRGC
"'Ali Saidi stated, 'The nation stands firm...'"
Hassan Rouhani (حسن روحانی) TARGET
Former President of Iran
"'Hassan Rouhani accused conservatives of forging and distorting this document...'"
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (آیت‌الله علی خامنه‌ای) QUOTED
Supreme Leader of Iran
"'This document and similar ones are not matters to which the Islamic Republic of Iran will submit...'"
Ali Larijani (علی لاریجانی) QUOTED
Former Speaker of the Iranian Parliament
"'Ali Larijani stating that the government's resolution does not have legal discrepancies.'"
Tasnim News Agency QUOTED
News Agency
"'According to Tasnim News Agency, Ali Saidi stated...'"
Friday prayer leaders ACTOR
Religious leaders
"'The attacks by Friday prayer leaders on UNESCO's Document 2030 continue...'"

⚡ Actions

Ali Saidi ANNOUNCE Document 2030
"'This Document 2030 is much more dangerous; why are the elites silent...'"
Confidence: 90%
Ali Saidi CRITICIZE Hassan Rouhani
"'...the presence of the people is hidden.'"
Confidence: 80%
conservatives ATTACK Hassan Rouhani's government
"'...this document promotes homosexuality education in schools.'"
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Ali Saidi warns elites about the dangers of Document 2030 in Iran's political landscape.

  • Ali Saidi announce Document 2030
  • Ali Saidi criticize Hassan Rouhani
  • conservatives attack Hassan Rouhani's government

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it highlights the internal divisions over educational policies and international agreements.
🌍 Regional: Because it reflects the conservative backlash against perceived Western influence.
🌐 International: Because it raises concerns about Iran's commitment to international agreements.

📚 Background

The debate over Document 2030 reveals significant ideological rifts within Iran.

📝 Key Evidence

"'This Document 2030 is much more dangerous; why are the elites silent...'"
→ Indicates the perceived threat of Document 2030 to Iranian values.
"'...this document promotes homosexuality education in schools.'"
→ Highlights the conservative opposition to Document 2030.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

Ali Saidi, the representative of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), described Document 2030 as 'very dangerous' on Tuesday, June 5. He called for a reaction from the 'elites' regarding it. Document 2030, which became a propaganda tool for conservatives to attack Hassan Rouhani during the recent presidential elections, is the United Nations Children's Fund's program for sustainable development. Its main focuses include eradicating infectious diseases, inclusive education, gender equality, eliminating discrimination, and addressing climate change. However, some conservatives have fiercely attacked Rouhani and his government, claiming that this document promotes homosexuality education in schools. This is despite the fact that the document emphasizes raising awareness among adolescents, especially girls, about preventing sexually transmitted diseases like AIDS and preventing early pregnancies. The draft of this document was presented in 2015 in Incheon, South Korea, and Iran accepted it conditionally. According to Tasnim News Agency, Ali Saidi stated, 'The nation stands firm like the 9th of Dey [the day of the uprising against the 2009 election results], but in some places, the presence of the people is hidden. This Document 2030 is much more dangerous; why are the elites silent, and why should the leadership be left alone? One must ask if there has been a decline among the elites. How many political figures do we have who said one thing at the beginning of the revolution and now say something else? This is a decline.' His remarks referred to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's statements on May 6 of this year. Ayatollah Khamenei said, 'This document and similar ones are not matters to which the Islamic Republic of Iran will submit, and signing this document and its silent implementation is certainly not permitted and has been communicated to the responsible agencies.' The Supreme Leader addressed government officials, saying, 'If you cannot oppose the essence of the work, explicitly state that the Islamic Republic of Iran has higher documents in education and does not need this document.' During the election campaigns, Hassan Rouhani accused conservatives of forging and distorting this document for electoral purposes. He stated that he would not forgive those who accused the country's teachers due to Document 2030. In this context, a religious authority in Qom stated that the status of Document 2030 in Iran must be clarified. The attacks by Friday prayer leaders on UNESCO's Document 2030 continue, with calls for the judiciary to invalidate the document. Twelve members of parliament warned Rouhani about Document 2030, and Rouhani announced efforts to alleviate Khamenei's 'concerns' regarding the document. The review of Document 2030 in parliament saw Ali Larijani stating that the government's resolution does not have legal discrepancies.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →