Large enterprises in Iran are not necessarily more productive. Contrary to the global trend, productivity declines as enterprises grow larger in the country. The lack of medium-sized enterprises and the significant presence of the government have exacerbated this pattern. According to Farshad Fatemi, privatization without deregulation cannot reform this structure; because the transfer of ownership, without competition and reduced government intervention, does not necessarily lead to improved performance. Economists believe that reforming the growth path of enterprises depends on competition, macroeconomic stability, access to global markets, and the gradual growth of productive enterprises.
Low Productivity in Large Enterprises
The article discusses the low productivity of large enterprises in Iran, highlighting that as companies grow, their efficiency decreases, influenced by government presence and a lack of medium-sized firms. Farshad Fatemi argues that without deregulation, privatization will not improve performance, emphasizing the need for competition and market access.
👥 Key Players
📰 What Happened
The article discusses the declining productivity of large enterprises in Iran, noting that larger companies are less efficient due to government involvement and a lack of medium-sized enterprises. Farshad Fatemi emphasizes that without deregulation, privatization efforts will not lead to improved performance.
- Large enterprises in Iran show declining productivity as they grow larger.
- Privatization without deregulation is unlikely to improve enterprise performance.
💡 Why It Matters
📚 Background
Iran's economy has faced challenges due to heavy government involvement and a lack of competitive markets, impacting productivity and growth.
🏷️ Entities Mentioned
Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →
Translation confidence: 85%