Also available in Persian — نسخه فارسی EN فا
🔴 Breaking ❓ Unknown

Member of Parliament: Araqchi said the lifting of arms sanctions was not a red line

Jun 16, 2026 June 16, 2026 3 min read 📰 Radio Farda
📋 Key Takeaway

Hosseini Naqavi reported that Abbas Araqchi stated the lifting of arms sanctions was not a red line for Iran, as the country has made significant military advancements. The discussion around the JCPOA and its implications for sanctions remains contentious, with Iran's missile program expected to proceed without restrictions. This matters as it indicates Iran's stance on sanctions and its military capabilities.

🔍 Quick Context Guide
💡 Bottom Line: Iran is asserting its military capabilities and dismissing arms sanctions as non-essential.

👥 Key Players

Abbas Araqchi (عباس عراقچی) QUOTED
Deputy Foreign Minister
""Iran, having achieved significant missile and military advancements... did not consider the lifting of arms and missile sanctions a 'red line'""
Hosseini Naqavi (حسینی نقی) QUOTED
spokesman for the special committee
""quoted Abbas Araqchi as saying that...""

⚡ Actions

Abbas Araqchi ANNOUNCE Iranian Parliament
""the lifting of arms and missile sanctions in the UN resolution a 'red line' for Tehran""
Confidence: 90%
Abbas Araqchi MEETING Iranian parliamentary committee
""attended a parliamentary committee meeting on September 6 to discuss the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)""
Confidence: 90%
Iran and the six world powers NEGOTIATE nuclear agreement
""spent long hours and days discussing the most contentious issues just before reaching the agreement""
Confidence: 80%

📰 What Happened

Iran's Araqchi states arms sanctions lifting is not a red line for Tehran.

  • Abbas Araqchi announce Iranian Parliament
  • Abbas Araqchi meeting Iranian parliamentary committee
  • Iran and the six world powers negotiate nuclear agreement

💡 Why It Matters

🇮🇷 For Iran: Because it indicates Iran's stance on military advancements and sanctions.
🌍 Regional: Because it may escalate tensions regarding arms sanctions in the Middle East.
🌐 International: Because it challenges the UN Security Council's authority on sanctions.

📚 Background

Iran is asserting its military capabilities and dismissing arms sanctions as non-essential.

📝 Key Evidence

""violating the JCPOA would lead to the reinstatement of sanctions, but violating the resolution would not""
→ This highlights Iran's interpretation of the JCPOA and its implications for sanctions.
📡 Source: STATE MEDIA
📊 Confidence: 80%
Radio Farda is known for its critical stance on the Iranian government.

Hosseini Naqavi, spokesman for the special committee reviewing the nuclear agreement in the Iranian Parliament, quoted Abbas Araqchi as saying that Iran, having achieved "significant missile and military advancements" and "not adhering to its sanctions," did not consider the lifting of arms and missile sanctions in the UN resolution a "red line" for Tehran. The Deputy Foreign Minister of Iran, who was also a senior member of the negotiating team with the six world powers, attended a parliamentary committee meeting on September 6 to discuss the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). According to the IRNA news agency, Mr. Naqavi quoted Mr. Araqchi stating that the JCPOA is an annex to the UN Security Council resolution following the nuclear agreement on July 14. However, he added, "the resolution is not part of the JCPOA." He further stated that, accordingly, "violating the JCPOA would lead to the reinstatement of sanctions, but violating the resolution would not, and according to this resolution, the arms and missile sanctions will not be lifted immediately." Abbas Araqchi explained to the Iranian parliamentary committee that this is why raising this issue in the Security Council resolution was not a red line for Tehran. However, the Iranian side was not willing for this issue to be raised in the nuclear agreement. According to this official, "the Islamic Republic's missile program will proceed at a faster pace and without restrictions." The UN Security Council issued a resolution on July 20, supporting the final agreement reached between Iran and the P5+1 regarding Tehran's nuclear program. Based on this resolution, the Security Council, with the approval of its members, allows the delivery of ballistic missile technology and heavy weapons to Iran. However, the United States has already stated it will veto such a move. Meanwhile, Iran's restrictions on ballistic missile technology will remain for eight years, and heavy weapons restrictions will last for five years. The Security Council resolution also maintains conventional arms sanctions against Iran for five years. Iran and the six world powers spent long hours and days discussing the most contentious issues just before reaching the agreement. At the same time, one of the most important issues discussed was the matter of Iran's arms and missile sanctions. Abbas Araqchi, as a government official, has once again urged the Iranian Parliament not to approve the JCPOA, as he stated that in that case, the nuclear agreement would become "law" and would no longer just be an agreement between countries.

🌐

Translated from the original and edited for English readers. View original source →

Translation confidence: 85%

📰 Related Coverage

⚖️ Independent Platform — Artesh.com is not affiliated with any government, military, or political organization. Editorial Policy →